The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency has been found to be violating its own policy by detaining migrants in secretive holding facilities for days or weeks, according to a recent investigation.
These small, concrete rooms, located at ICE offices, federal buildings, and other locations across the country, are typically used to hold people after they have been arrested but before being transferred or released. However, ICE's internal policies prohibit detaining migrants in these facilities for longer than 12 hours.
In June, the agency waived this policy, allowing it to detain migrants in holding rooms for up to three days. Despite this change, data analysis has found that ICE continues to violate its own policy by holding migrants at these sites for multiple days at a time.
The investigation reveals that there is limited oversight of ICE's holding facilities nationwide, leading to concerns about unknown and potentially troubling conditions inside. Advocates have expressed alarm about the extended use of these facilities, citing risks of abuse, medical neglect, and due process violations.
A former ICE official described the situation as "wildly, wildly fucked up," highlighting the risk of sexual abuse or assault among detainees. The official also noted that prolonged detention increases the likelihood of such incidents occurring.
The investigation highlights a growing crisis in immigration enforcement operations, with officials relying increasingly on a network of holding facilities to process arrests. This has led to overcrowding and backlogs, resulting in people being held in these facilities for extended periods.
ICE's lack of transparency and accountability has been criticized by advocates and former officials alike. The agency's secretive nature and failure to provide adequate oversight have raised concerns about the conditions inside these facilities.
In Baltimore, a similar case is playing out in the Maryland federal court, where a lawsuit has been filed against ICE alleging medical neglect and overcrowding. The Trump administration's attempts to dismiss the lawsuit were unsuccessful, as attorneys argued that Congress had jurisdiction over the issue.
The government shutdown has further hindered congressional oversight of ICE and its holding facilities, preventing lawmakers from conducting inspections and raising concerns about the agency's ability to operate safely and constitutionally.
Overall, the investigation reveals a systemic problem within ICE, with the agency prioritizing its own interests over the welfare and rights of migrants in its custody.
These small, concrete rooms, located at ICE offices, federal buildings, and other locations across the country, are typically used to hold people after they have been arrested but before being transferred or released. However, ICE's internal policies prohibit detaining migrants in these facilities for longer than 12 hours.
In June, the agency waived this policy, allowing it to detain migrants in holding rooms for up to three days. Despite this change, data analysis has found that ICE continues to violate its own policy by holding migrants at these sites for multiple days at a time.
The investigation reveals that there is limited oversight of ICE's holding facilities nationwide, leading to concerns about unknown and potentially troubling conditions inside. Advocates have expressed alarm about the extended use of these facilities, citing risks of abuse, medical neglect, and due process violations.
A former ICE official described the situation as "wildly, wildly fucked up," highlighting the risk of sexual abuse or assault among detainees. The official also noted that prolonged detention increases the likelihood of such incidents occurring.
The investigation highlights a growing crisis in immigration enforcement operations, with officials relying increasingly on a network of holding facilities to process arrests. This has led to overcrowding and backlogs, resulting in people being held in these facilities for extended periods.
ICE's lack of transparency and accountability has been criticized by advocates and former officials alike. The agency's secretive nature and failure to provide adequate oversight have raised concerns about the conditions inside these facilities.
In Baltimore, a similar case is playing out in the Maryland federal court, where a lawsuit has been filed against ICE alleging medical neglect and overcrowding. The Trump administration's attempts to dismiss the lawsuit were unsuccessful, as attorneys argued that Congress had jurisdiction over the issue.
The government shutdown has further hindered congressional oversight of ICE and its holding facilities, preventing lawmakers from conducting inspections and raising concerns about the agency's ability to operate safely and constitutionally.
Overall, the investigation reveals a systemic problem within ICE, with the agency prioritizing its own interests over the welfare and rights of migrants in its custody.