Threads is making it easier to hide replies you don't like

Threads is taking a step towards giving users more control over their online conversations, allowing them to curate which replies they want to see. The platform is rolling out a new feature called Reply Approvals, where users can review responses before deciding whether to show them publicly. This option can be applied individually to each post, rather than being a blanket policy, giving users granular control over who can comment on their content.

The addition of filters for viewing replies will also make it easier for users to sort through the comments on posts from accounts they follow or by mentions. However, some are raising concerns about whether this new feature is an attempt to stifle constructive discussion and hinder meaningful conversations online.

As part of its recent push for growth, Threads has been introducing various features that cater to users' preferences. The platform's take on ephemeral "ghost" posts was introduced earlier in the week, following similar models seen on Instagram Stories. With 150 million daily active users, Threads is undoubtedly becoming a significant player in the social media landscape.

Critics are already pointing out that while Reply Approvals may provide some level of control for users, it could also limit the visibility of comments from accounts that are not allowed to see replies publicly. This has sparked debate about the balance between freedom of expression and online safety.

idk about this new feature on threads... i mean its cool and all but what if ppl just dont respond or engage with u bc they cant see other peoples comments? thats like half the fun of having a convo right? also, dont even get me started on how its gonna affect threads' overall feel and vibe - is it still the same chill place or are we just gonna have a bunch of ghost posts floating around?!

idk why threads is tryin to do this tho , on one hand its cool that u can control who sees ur comments, but on da other hand, r u takin away from ppl's right 2 express themselves freely? like if i'm talkin about somethin important and only ppl u approve of get 2 see the convo, what's da point of even havin a discussion?

this is all kinda fishy you know? Threads is just trying to make more money off us by giving users even more ways to control what they see and don't see on their feeds. like what's really going on here? are they just trying to create a whole new way to sell ads or something? and now we're all gonna be stuck in these little echo chambers where only the voices we want to hear get through? it sounds like a setup for some kind of social experiment to me

I don’t usually comment but I think this new feature is kinda cool, you know? Like, if someone's being a total troll on your post, it's nice to be able to hide their replies without having to report them or block them. But at the same time, some people are worried that it'll stifle real discussions and debates, which I don’t think is necessarily true

I mean, if you're not comfortable with someone saying something in your comments section, it's okay to hide their reply, but that doesn't mean they can't express themselves elsewhere. And if some people are getting worried about their comments being hidden from others, maybe we need to talk about online etiquette and how we communicate with each other instead of just focusing on features like this

I think this new feature is a total game changer ! On one hand, being able to review responses before deciding whether to show them publicly gives users way more control over their online conversations . I mean, we've all had those cringeworthy comments or awkward interactions that we just want to keep hidden from the world . This feature is like a refresh button for our social media sanity .

But at the same time, I get why some people are raising concerns about this new feature stifling constructive discussion . Like, what if someone has an important comment to share but their reply gets lost in a sea of approvals? Or what if smaller accounts can't participate in conversations because they're not allowed to see replies publicly? It's all about finding that balance between freedom of expression and online safety .

I'm actually really excited to try out this new feature and experiment with it myself . Who knows, maybe we'll create a whole new way of engaging with each other online !

OMG I think this is a sick move by Threads!!! They're finally giving us more agency over our online conversations, which is so overdue . I mean, who hasn't scrolled through their feed and thought "ugh, I don't need that noise"? It's gonna be so cool to be able to curate my replies and only see what I want to see. And the filters for viewing replies? Game changer! But yeah, some people are gonna miss out on conversations if they're not allowed to see replies publicly... that's a tough balance to strike though

I think this new feature is a game changer for Threads . As we're all aware, social media can get super overwhelming with all the drama and trolls, so being able to control who sees your replies will be a total lifesaver. I love that it's not just a one-size-fits-all approach, but rather users can apply it individually to each post – genius! At the same time, I do think there's a valid concern about stifling constructive discussion, but I'm hoping that people will use this feature in moderation and only block people who are being super toxic. It's all about finding that balance between freedom of expression and online safety, you know?

threads should just let ppl have control over their own conversations lol, its like, if someone don't wanna hear some other persons opinion then they shouldn't, it's not that hard to block or mute them but seriously though, I think this new feature is a step in the right direction, gives users agency and can lead to way more respectful conversations.

I think its a great idea to have more control over our online conversations ! I mean, who doesn't want to avoid all the drama and negativity on social media? With Reply Approvals, users can basically filter out what they don't wanna see . But at the same time, its true that it could also stifle some real important discussions . Like, what if someone's trying to share a valid point of view but their comment gets lost in all the approved replies? I think the key is finding that balance between freedom and safety, you know? Maybe Threads can create some guidelines or best practices for using Reply Approvals so everyone knows how it works .

I think this new feature is super cool . I mean, who doesn't want to have more control over what they see on their timeline? It's like having a digital filter for your mind . But at the same time, I can see why some people might be worried that it could stifle discussions between people with different opinions. I've had some pretty heated conversations online before and it's always a good thing to have more control over who gets to see my responses . On the other hand, I also think it's a bit of a double-edged sword - if you can only see replies from people you approve, then doesn't that kind of limit your access to new ideas and perspectives?

OMG, Threads is trying to be all PC ... like, who wouldn't want to approve their replies? I mean, we've been living in a world where we can just delete comments that annoy us for years now . Now they're giving users the power to do it, and everyone's suddenly concerned about stifling discussion ? I'm no expert, but isn't the point of social media to have some level of noise and chaos? If you don't like someone's comment, just block them or mute their replies .

And what's with all these concerns about online safety? Can't people just use their common sense? I'm not saying Reply Approvals are a bad thing, but let's not pretend that we've never had to deal with trolls and haters before . It's time for us to grow up and learn how to have real conversations online without relying on features that filter out the noise .

I guess what I'm saying is, don't @ me if this new feature is a game-changer or a total bust . I'll just be over here, enjoying my ghost posts .

Threads is trying to tame the beast that is online discussions lol. I mean, have you seen some comments sections? It's like a war zone . But seriously, Reply Approvals is a good step towards giving users more control over their conversations. I'm all for being able to filter out trolls and only see positive vibes . And yeah, it's also a good way to prevent online harassment which is just not cool . The concern about stifling constructive discussion is valid, but like, shouldn't we want to promote meaningful conversations?

I gotta say, I'm all for giving users more control over their online conversations ... I mean, who doesn't love having the power to decide what they want to see in their feeds? It's like having a personal filter for your social media experience . At the same time, though, I can see how Reply Approvals could be misused by trolls or people trying to avoid accountability . On one hand, it's awesome that Threads is listening to its users and giving them more agency online . But on the other hand, I hope they're thinking about all the possible edge cases... like what happens when someone tries to hide behind these approvals?

I totally get why Threads is trying to give users more control over their conversations, we've all been in situations where it's hard to navigate through a thread with too many comments . But at the same time, I'm worried thatReply Approvals might be taken too far and end up stifling the very discussions we want to have online . It's a delicate balance between being safe and allowing for open conversation. Fingers crossed that Threads can get it right

I'm loving this new feature on Threads! As someone who's always been mindful of the conversations I engage in online, this is like, a total game-changer . Being able to review responses before sharing them publicly feels so much more intentional and respectful... especially for people who might not want their comments seen by everyone. But at the same time, I can see how it could be used to stifle some of those amazing conversations that happen online . The balance between freedom of expression and online safety is like, super delicate, you know?

I'm not sure I fully get this new feature on Threads . On one hand, it's kinda cool that users can control what they see in their conversations, but on the other hand, it could be kinda frustrating if you're trying to have a conversation with someone and they only show you some parts of your message . I mean, aren't we supposed to be able to talk freely online? It feels like this new feature might be making things more complicated than they need to be . And what about all the people who just wanna chime in on a conversation without being told if their comments are good or bad by others? Does this new thing really solve anything, or is it just gonna create more problems?

omg dont expect threads new reply approvals feature to actually solve anything its just a way for them to make more money by letting users pay for premium features meanwhile all the real issues like harassment and hate speech will still be there just hidden behind a layer of curated replies u mean what if the people who arent allowed to see replies publicly are the ones fighting against online bullying or fake news

I'm all for giving people more control over their online conversations . It's like, if you don't wanna engage with some annoying person, you shouldn't have to see their replies on your posts. But at the same time, I get why there are concerns about stifling discussions. Like, what if it just becomes a game of who can come up with the most creative ways to avoid engaging with others?

It's also worth considering that this feature might benefit users who are trying to maintain their mental health online. Too many distractions and trolls can be overwhelming . But how do we balance that with the need for open dialogue and connection? I think it's all about finding a happy medium .

And honestly, I'm just excited to see what other features Threads comes up with . They're definitely doing something right by listening to their users and adapting to their needs .

I mean think about it... we're so used to just seeing what others are saying without any control over it . It's like we're just along for the ride, never really getting a chance to catch our breath or pause before responding . This new feature is actually kinda cool because it lets us take that power back, you know? We get to decide who gets to see what and when . But on the other hand, it's also making me think about how we're always trying to balance freedom with safety... like, do we really want to limit certain voices from being heard just to avoid drama or hurt feelings ? It's a tricky one, but I guess that's what makes online conversations so interesting .