Detroit demolished 27,000 abandoned homes under Duggan as Land Bank inventory dwindles - Detroit Metro Times

Detroit's Demolition Effort Under Fire as Land Bank Inventory Dwindles.

The city of Detroit has made significant strides in its effort to clear out abandoned homes since Mayor Mike Duggan took office in 2014. Over the past decade, the city has demolished approximately 27,000 vacant houses and sold another 19,000 for renovation, exceeding the initial targets set by the city.

In 2014, Detroit's land bank authority had an estimated 47,000 abandoned homes under its control. However, this number has dwindled to just 942 as of this month, according to a final report released by Duggan ahead of the closeout of Proposal N, a voter-approved bond program that funded the second phase of demolitions.

While the city has made significant progress in clearing out vacant properties, an ongoing environmental cleanup effort is now tied to the final closeout of Proposal N. Contaminated soil used at some demolition sites has raised concerns, and officials are working with environmental consulting firm Mannik & Smith Group to test every site where contaminated soil is suspected.

According to Duggan, 240 of the remaining homes are slated for demolition within the next six months, while 702 are expected to be sold to buyers willing to renovate them in 2026. The city has set aside $15 million in Proposal N closeout funds to address soil remediation, making it unlikely that the cleanup will affect Detroit's finances.

Despite the challenges, Duggan says the effort is one of his administration's most satisfying accomplishments. "Homeowners who stayed in Detroit and never left were the ones who gained the most wealth," he said. A University of Michigan study released earlier this year found that Detroit homeowners gained a total $4.6 billion in home equity between 2014 and 2023, with appreciation recorded in every neighborhood.

However, the investigation into Iron Horse's operations is ongoing, and contractors who intentionally used unapproved soil sources may face fraud charges. The state Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) is overseeing the investigation, which has intensified this year after investigators determined that contaminated soil may have been used at dozens of residential demolition sites.

While the city continues to make progress in its effort to clear out vacant properties, the ongoing environmental cleanup effort raises questions about the effectiveness of the city's approach. As the final closeout of Proposal N nears, officials must ensure that the cleanup is thorough and that responsible contractors are held accountable for their actions.
 
I dont get why they cant just use machines to do all the demolition work? ๐Ÿค” It sounds like a lot of money going into soil testing and stuff... I mean i know its better than having toxic houses around, but 942 homes is still a lot... what happened to the people who lived in those houses? did they get help with finding new places to live or was it all just swept under the rug? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
I just read this news about Detroit's demolition effort and I gotta say, it's kinda weird ๐Ÿค”. They've made so much progress in clearing out those abandoned homes, but now they're worried about some contaminated soil? It's like, what's next? ๐Ÿ˜… They're trying to clean up all the old houses before they can even sell them to people who wanna renovate them. It just seems like a lot of work for not a lot of money ๐Ÿ’ธ.

I also don't get why there are still so many homes left over ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. I mean, it's not like the city didn't do enough to clear out the abandoned ones already ๐Ÿšฎ. Now they're just gonna have to test every site for soil contamination? That sounds like a lot of hassle ๐Ÿ˜“.

I guess what really gets me is that some contractors might be in trouble for using unapproved soil sources โš ๏ธ. Like, I get it, we need to protect the environment and all that ๐ŸŒฟ. But at the same time, let's not forget that people are trying to fix up those old homes too ๐Ÿ‘.

Anyway, I just think the city needs to find a way to balance progress with cleanup efforts ๐Ÿ“ˆ๐Ÿ’ช. It's like they're taking two steps forward and one step back ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ.
 
I'm kinda surprised by how much progress Detroit's made in clearing out abandoned homes ๐Ÿค”. 27,000 demolitions is a huge number! But now they're facing some issues with contaminated soil ๐Ÿšฎ. I mean, it's not ideal to think that some of those demolitions might have been done with potentially toxic materials on site. It raises questions about accountability and transparency, especially since contractors could be looking at fraud charges.

I also feel like the city is being pretty optimistic about how much of a success this whole process has been ๐Ÿค‘. Sure, homeowners who stayed in Detroit saw some gains in home equity, but what about those whose homes were demolished without warning? Don't they deserve more consideration?

It's not all bad news though - the city is making sure to set aside funds for soil remediation and everything โš–๏ธ. But I think it's time for a closer look at how this whole process was handled. Was it just a case of good intentions gone wrong, or are there deeper systemic issues at play? ๐Ÿค”
 
I mean come on... $4.6 billion in home equity gained by Detroit homeowners? That sounds like a total pipe dream to me ๐Ÿคฃ. I'm not saying it's all bad, but let's be real, most of those homes were still vacant and being torn down when the city started this demolition effort. What did homeowners do with that money, exactly? Invest in some fancy new fixer-upper? Please... and what about the ones who actually lived in those houses and got priced out by gentrification? They're the real victims here ๐Ÿ˜’. And don't even get me started on the environmental cleanup - if 240 homes are being demolished next year, how much soil is going to be contaminated again? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
i'm still trying to understand why they need to keep demolishing homes in detroit ๐Ÿค”... i mean, the city has made some progress, but it's like, what's the point of clearing out old houses if there aren't enough new ones being built to replace them? ๐Ÿ’ธ and now they're worried about contaminated soil? that's just a band-aid solution, imo... shouldn't we be focusing on rebuilding and making sure people have affordable housing options? ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ’•
 
Ugh ๐Ÿค• Detroit's demolition effort is a mixed bag at best. On one hand, they've made progress by demolishing 27,000 homes and selling another 19,000 for renovation - not bad considering the state of the city back in 2014. But on the other hand, the land bank inventory has dwindled to just 942, which is a far cry from the original 47,000. And now they're dealing with environmental cleanup issues because of contaminated soil at some demolition sites ๐Ÿšฎ๐Ÿ’ฆ. It's like they were trying to clean up one mess only to create another. I mean, who wants to renovate a house that's been tainted by toxic waste? Not me ๐Ÿ˜’.
 
๐Ÿค” The Detroit demolition effort's success is a complex narrative, with notable achievements in clearing out vacant homes - 27,000 demolished & 19,000 sold for renovation since 2014 ๐Ÿ . However, the dwindling land bank inventory from 47,000 to 942 homes poses questions about the sustainability of this approach ๐Ÿคฏ. The recent environmental cleanup effort has also raised concerns over contaminated soil and its potential impact on the city's finances ๐Ÿ’ธ. A more nuanced evaluation is needed to balance progress with accountability for responsible contractors and thorough cleanup measures ๐Ÿ“.
 
The Detroit demolition effort's trajectory is an intriguing case study in urban renewal ๐Ÿค”. On one hand, the progress made since 2014 is laudable, with a significant reduction in vacant homes and tangible benefits to homeowners. The $4.6 billion in home equity gained by Detroit residents between 2014 and 2023 is a testament to the city's revitalization efforts ๐Ÿ‘.

However, the environmental cleanup effort now underway raises concerns about the long-term sustainability of this approach ๐Ÿšฎ. The dwindling number of abandoned homes (from 47,000 to 942) suggests that the city may be relying too heavily on demolition as a means of revitalization. Moreover, the potential for contractors to intentionally use contaminated soil sources undermines the integrity of the process ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ.

To mitigate these risks, it's essential that the city continues to prioritize transparency and accountability in its environmental cleanup efforts ๐Ÿ’ก. The ongoing investigation into Iron Horse's operations will help ensure that responsible contractors are held accountable for their actions ๐Ÿšซ. Ultimately, a more nuanced approach that balances urban renewal with environmental responsibility is necessary to achieve lasting success ๐ŸŒŸ.
 
omg u guys idk wut's goin on in detroit rn they r tryna clean up abandoned homes but it sounds like dey got a major environmental issue on deir hands contaminated soil from demolitions havin raised concerns ๐Ÿค• and now contractors who used dat unapproved stuff might get in trouble ๐Ÿšจ wut kinda satisfaction can u feel when u gotta deal wiv that kinda mess? ๐Ÿค” i mean mayor duggan says homeowners who stayed in detroit gained the most wealth but i'm not so sure bout dat ๐Ÿค‘ i hope dey get it right tho and dont let contractors screw it up ๐Ÿ™
 
I'm literally so proud of Detroit for making such massive progress in clearing out those abandoned homes ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿ  I mean, 27,000 demolished houses is insane! And the fact that they've sold another 19k for renovation? Game changer for the city's economy ๐Ÿ’ธ And let's not forget about the $4.6 billion in home equity gained by homeowners who stayed put - that's LIFE.CHANGING ๐ŸŒŸ Of course, we gotta keep an eye on the environmental cleanup effort, but I trust Mayor Duggan and his team to get it done right ๐Ÿ’ฏ
 
Ugh, this whole demolition thing in Detroit just feels like a big mess waiting to happen ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. They're basically running out of properties to clear out, but now they're worried about contaminated soil? This is just a ticking time bomb waiting for some major lawsuit or environmental disaster to hit ๐Ÿšจ. And don't even get me started on the fact that contractors might be getting away with using unapproved soil sources... that's just peachy ๐Ÿคฅ. I mean, sure, the city's made some progress, but at what cost? It sounds like they're just papering over the problems instead of actually addressing them ๐Ÿ’ธ.
 
I'm low-key worried about what's happening in Detroit right now ๐Ÿค•. They've already demolished like 27k houses, but we still got people concerned about soil contamination from demolition sites? I feel like the city's making progress, but they're also playing with fire here. I mean, $15m for cleanup is a big chunk of change, but it's just not enough if contractors are gonna mess up like that. And what about all those homeowners who were supposed to gain wealth from renovation? Did anyone even check in on them? It's like, the city's got some good stuff going, but they need to make sure everything's on the up-and-up before they move forward with more big projects ๐Ÿค”
 
the city of detroit's demolition efforts have been super impressive over the past decade ๐Ÿคฉ but now they're facing a new challenge with all these contaminated soils ๐Ÿ˜ท it's crazy how 47,000 abandoned homes went from being a major issue to just 942 and then some are still stuck in limbo ๐Ÿคฏ what's going on here is that people who stayed in detroit and didn't leave actually ended up benefiting the most financially ๐Ÿ’ธ but what about those who got screwed by contractors who used unapproved soil sources? they need to be held accountable for their actions โš ๏ธ it's also wild that there was a $15 million budget set aside just for soil remediation ๐Ÿค‘ what if this cleanup effort doesn't get done properly and detroit gets stuck with environmental issues too? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
Back
Top