A Mobile Misstep: Why I Regret Ditching My Physical SIM Card for an eSIM
For a long time, switching between mobile phones was as easy as swiping through your phonebook. But with the rise of embedded SIMs (eSIM), that convenience has come at a steep price – regret.
Once ubiquitous SIM cards, those small plastic slips of information are now on the verge of extinction. Phone manufacturers have started dropping the SIM slot, and Google has finally joined the fray with its Pixel 10 series. But I took the plunge far too soon, and boy, do I wish I hadn't.
The eSIM revolution began in 2016, slowly gaining traction as a secondary option in smartphones. Instead of holding your phone number on a removable card, an eSIM is a programmable, nonremovable component soldered to the circuit board. This allows you to store multiple SIMs and swap between them in software – but it also takes up less space.
Apple was the first major smartphone maker to force the use of eSIM with its iPhone 14, and now Google has followed suit. But while Apple's move made sense, switching to an eSIM for me was a costly mistake. The process of setting up my new phone was far more complicated than I expected, and it often left me feeling frustrated.
The biggest problem? Losing access to your phone number when you need it most. When I had to switch between phones on a daily basis – as I did during my time reviewing multiple devices each month – I never had a problem with my SIM card. But since switching to an eSIM, I've needed to move my number only occasionally, and even then, it's been a hassle.
Google's built-in tools have made things slightly easier, but carriers still bear the brunt of responsibility for fixing these issues. The experience is far more frustrating than using a physical SIM card, which is essentially foolproof. Swapping out a tiny piece of plastic takes seconds – and it never requires you to sit on hold with your carrier's support agents or drive to a store.
The implications go beyond just phone switching. Our reliance on SMS for multifactor authentication is flawed. Phone numbers are too important to be unguarded, but carriers' current approach guarantees bad experiences in the era of eSIMs.
So what's next? There needs to be a better way to confirm account ownership when an eSIM glitches – one that doesn't rely on outdated SMS technology. Google's Fi app comes close, offering secure downloads and setup via the same security settings as your Google account. But it's still not enough to make up for the hassle of switching to an eSIM.
In the end, it's hard to justify the 8% boost in battery life over a convenient SIM card swap. The convenience we've lost is too great a cost. We should be looking for ways to fix our broken system – not blindly adopting new technologies that make things more complicated.
For a long time, switching between mobile phones was as easy as swiping through your phonebook. But with the rise of embedded SIMs (eSIM), that convenience has come at a steep price – regret.
Once ubiquitous SIM cards, those small plastic slips of information are now on the verge of extinction. Phone manufacturers have started dropping the SIM slot, and Google has finally joined the fray with its Pixel 10 series. But I took the plunge far too soon, and boy, do I wish I hadn't.
The eSIM revolution began in 2016, slowly gaining traction as a secondary option in smartphones. Instead of holding your phone number on a removable card, an eSIM is a programmable, nonremovable component soldered to the circuit board. This allows you to store multiple SIMs and swap between them in software – but it also takes up less space.
Apple was the first major smartphone maker to force the use of eSIM with its iPhone 14, and now Google has followed suit. But while Apple's move made sense, switching to an eSIM for me was a costly mistake. The process of setting up my new phone was far more complicated than I expected, and it often left me feeling frustrated.
The biggest problem? Losing access to your phone number when you need it most. When I had to switch between phones on a daily basis – as I did during my time reviewing multiple devices each month – I never had a problem with my SIM card. But since switching to an eSIM, I've needed to move my number only occasionally, and even then, it's been a hassle.
Google's built-in tools have made things slightly easier, but carriers still bear the brunt of responsibility for fixing these issues. The experience is far more frustrating than using a physical SIM card, which is essentially foolproof. Swapping out a tiny piece of plastic takes seconds – and it never requires you to sit on hold with your carrier's support agents or drive to a store.
The implications go beyond just phone switching. Our reliance on SMS for multifactor authentication is flawed. Phone numbers are too important to be unguarded, but carriers' current approach guarantees bad experiences in the era of eSIMs.
So what's next? There needs to be a better way to confirm account ownership when an eSIM glitches – one that doesn't rely on outdated SMS technology. Google's Fi app comes close, offering secure downloads and setup via the same security settings as your Google account. But it's still not enough to make up for the hassle of switching to an eSIM.
In the end, it's hard to justify the 8% boost in battery life over a convenient SIM card swap. The convenience we've lost is too great a cost. We should be looking for ways to fix our broken system – not blindly adopting new technologies that make things more complicated.