Maresca and Amorim's Misstep: When Power Hiders Fail the Club
The recent sacking of Ruben Amorim at Manchester United marks a stark reality: head coaches and managers are increasingly taking the fall for their teams' failures. Their departures serve as a stark reminder that those wielding real power within a football club should also be willing to face the music.
In Amorim's case, his honesty with the media often felt like an asset rather than a liability. His respectful answers, although detrimental to his own cause at times, showed that he was willing to confront criticism head-on. This approach is a far cry from some of his counterparts who have dodged scrutiny by remaining in the shadows.
The case of Chelsea's co-sporting directors, Paul Winstanley and Laurence Stewart, serves as another example of how those with real power within a club should be willing to speak out. When Enzo Maresca was sacked, their names did not appear on the statement, despite having touted his "ambitions and work ethic align with those of the club" upon his initial appointment.
This selective silence raises questions about whether their recruitment efforts have played a role in Chelsea's recent slump. It is time for them to take ownership of their decisions and acknowledge that they are responsible for the team's on-field performance.
Jason Wilcox, Manchester United's director of football, also seems to be avoiding scrutiny by staying out of the spotlight. His rare appearances in front of the media have been met with positive messages, which seems like a cop-out given his role in shaping the team's strategy.
The minority owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe, while more open to media duties, lacks expertise on the sport itself. This lack of knowledge makes it difficult for him to offer meaningful insights or take ownership of the team's performance.
In contrast, sporting directors at lower-tier clubs like Bayer Leverkusen have shown that being willing to address questions from the media and explain their decisions can be an effective way to build trust with fans and stakeholders.
Ultimately, football clubs are professional businesses with clear strategies in place. It is not fair that one person should bear the brunt of blame when things go wrong, especially when trial by fire leads to them being found guilty and ultimately sacked.
The power-hiders who refuse to take responsibility for their teams' failures will continue to be seen as weak linkages within a football club's structure. Those who truly wield real power must be willing to face the music and own up to their decisions, rather than hiding behind selective silence or PR spin. Only then can clubs start to build trust with fans and stakeholders, and work towards long-term success on and off the pitch.
The recent sacking of Ruben Amorim at Manchester United marks a stark reality: head coaches and managers are increasingly taking the fall for their teams' failures. Their departures serve as a stark reminder that those wielding real power within a football club should also be willing to face the music.
In Amorim's case, his honesty with the media often felt like an asset rather than a liability. His respectful answers, although detrimental to his own cause at times, showed that he was willing to confront criticism head-on. This approach is a far cry from some of his counterparts who have dodged scrutiny by remaining in the shadows.
The case of Chelsea's co-sporting directors, Paul Winstanley and Laurence Stewart, serves as another example of how those with real power within a club should be willing to speak out. When Enzo Maresca was sacked, their names did not appear on the statement, despite having touted his "ambitions and work ethic align with those of the club" upon his initial appointment.
This selective silence raises questions about whether their recruitment efforts have played a role in Chelsea's recent slump. It is time for them to take ownership of their decisions and acknowledge that they are responsible for the team's on-field performance.
Jason Wilcox, Manchester United's director of football, also seems to be avoiding scrutiny by staying out of the spotlight. His rare appearances in front of the media have been met with positive messages, which seems like a cop-out given his role in shaping the team's strategy.
The minority owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe, while more open to media duties, lacks expertise on the sport itself. This lack of knowledge makes it difficult for him to offer meaningful insights or take ownership of the team's performance.
In contrast, sporting directors at lower-tier clubs like Bayer Leverkusen have shown that being willing to address questions from the media and explain their decisions can be an effective way to build trust with fans and stakeholders.
Ultimately, football clubs are professional businesses with clear strategies in place. It is not fair that one person should bear the brunt of blame when things go wrong, especially when trial by fire leads to them being found guilty and ultimately sacked.
The power-hiders who refuse to take responsibility for their teams' failures will continue to be seen as weak linkages within a football club's structure. Those who truly wield real power must be willing to face the music and own up to their decisions, rather than hiding behind selective silence or PR spin. Only then can clubs start to build trust with fans and stakeholders, and work towards long-term success on and off the pitch.