Mayor Johnson will push for budget vote next week, even with Finance chair opposed to head tax 'at any level'

Mayor Johnson's Budget Push May Hit Snag as Finance Chair Opposes Corporate Head Tax

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is pushing forward with his plan to finalize his 2026 budget by Thanksgiving, despite opposition from key finance chair Pat Dowell. Dowell, a member of Johnson's leadership team and a leading voice on the City Council, has declared her unwavering opposition to any corporate head tax at "any level." This stance forces Johnson back onto the bargaining table as he attempts to craft a compromise that will secure the necessary 26 votes for passage.

Johnson's revised budget proposal aims to impose a $21 monthly per-employee tax only on companies with 200 or more employees. However, Dowell's firm refusal to budge has led Johnson to open the door to exploring alternative revenue-raising ideas, challenging her and other critics to "show up with an idea that we can debate." The mayor insists he is committed to deliberation, but also believes that slowing down the process would be counterproductive.

The stakes are high for Johnson as he navigates this delicate dance. With Dowell's opposition, he risks a repeat of last year's budget stalemate – which saw a 27-23 vote in favor of his proposed $300 million property tax increase only after the Council unanimously rejected it and refused to raise property taxes.

Johnson is facing a tough sell with Dowell, who has clashed with him on several occasions. The finance chair has been vocal about her concerns regarding Johnson's Green Social Housing ordinance, further solidifying their divide. With 18 of 34 votes needed for passage in the Finance Committee, where Dowell chairs, there is genuine risk that Johnson could see his revenue package rejected.

Johnson's push for a head tax compromise is being watched closely by observers, with some speculating that he may use a Finance Committee defeat as ammunition to portray opponents as champions of wealthy corporations. However, the mayor insists this is not about pitting people against one another; it is about making a clear choice between challenging large corporations to "put more skin in the game" and balancing the budget on the backs of working people.

With Thanksgiving looming, Johnson's team remains hopeful that they can craft a compromise that satisfies Dowell and secures the necessary votes. However, as the stakes continue to rise, it remains to be seen whether this delicate dance will ultimately yield success for the mayor's ambitious budget proposal.
 
so frustrating 🀯. think corporations should pay more taxes already πŸ’Έ. head tax might not be perfect solution but it's a start πŸ‘. mayor's trying to balance books, we should support him on that πŸ’ͺ. but at same time, need to make sure ppl aren't getting screwed too much πŸ€‘. hope they can find compromise soon ⏰. dowell seems super stubborn πŸ˜’, not sure if her opposition is gonna be deal-breaker πŸ€”. wish mayor could just fast track this thing and get it done already πŸ•’οΈ!
 
The Chicago Mayor's push for a corporate head tax is facing significant resistance from Pat Dowell, who's refusal to budge on the issue has forced Johnson to consider alternative revenue streams πŸ€”. The stakes are high, with only 18 of 34 votes needed for passage in the Finance Committee and a repeat of last year's budget stalemate looming large πŸ’Έ.

It seems Johnson is trying to thread the needle between appeasing Dowell and securing the necessary votes, but it's unclear whether his compromise will be enough to win over her and the rest of the Council πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. The tension between Johnson and Dowell is palpable, with their disagreements on the Green Social Housing ordinance further exacerbating their divide 🌎.

As Thanksgiving approaches, Johnson's team remains optimistic about securing a compromise, but it's hard to predict how things will play out 🍽️. One thing's for sure, though - the outcome of this delicate dance will have significant implications for the city's budget and its ability to address pressing issues like affordability and inequality πŸ“Š.
 
I gotta disagree with Johnson here... πŸ€‘ He's all about the corporate heads putting more skin in the game, but what about the little guys? I think Dowell's stance on a corporate head tax is totally reasonable and it's high time we start holding large corporations accountable for their fair share. Slowin' down the process might be counterproductive, but that just means Johnson needs to listen more and compromise more 🀝
 
I'm really disappointed in the corporate head tax idea πŸ€•. It's not like a new concept, other cities have been doing it for years and it seems reasonable enough. 21 bucks per employee might seem small but it adds up quickly especially for big companies. I get that the mayor wants to balance the budget, but this feels like a quick fix rather than a real solution. And let's be honest, Pat Dowell has a point about corporations not contributing enough already πŸ€‘. It's not about pitting people against each other, it's about making them pay their fair share. This whole thing is just so messy and I hope they can get something done before Thanksgiving πŸ’Έ.
 
idk why corporate heads have to pay more taxes lol πŸ˜‚πŸ€‘ they already got rich off their companies, can't they chip in a lil bit? πŸ’Έ and what's up with Pat Dowell being super strict about this, can't she just chill for once? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ the mayor's trying hard to find common ground but it's like, come on guys, let's not make things harder than they need to be πŸ˜…
 
I'm loving the drama unfolding in Chicago City Council 🀯! Brandon Johnson is like a pro wrestler trying to wriggle out of that head tax noose πŸ’‡β€β™‚οΈ. Dowell's opposition is forcing him to get creative, which could lead to some innovative solutions πŸ’‘. But let's be real, this whole thing feels like a classic game of chicken πŸ“ - who blinks first? Johnson's team is trying to paint opponents as corporate shills, but it's gonna take more than a few tweets to convince voters πŸ€”. I'm keeping an eye on this one, folks! The clock is ticking for Thanksgiving... πŸ•°οΈ
 
I'm telling ya, dude πŸ€”, this corporate head tax thing is like, soooo complicated! I mean, Pat Dowell is being super strict about it, and Brandon Johnson is all like "come on, compromise!" πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ But seriously, it's like, what's the harm in a little extra revenue from big corps? They're raking it in, while our city's struggling πŸ’Έ. And now they're trying to slow down the process just to get their way? Come on, man! πŸ˜’ It feels like politics as usual, you know? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ The thing is, I'm all for making the rich pay more, but do we have to make it so hard for ourselves? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ I don't think so, bro...
 
πŸ€” I think Pat Dowell is being super reasonable here. I mean, a $21 monthly per-employee tax on companies with 200+ employees seems like a pretty low bar, right? πŸ€‘ And yeah, it's not like she's against the idea of taxing corporations in general... just that she thinks it should be more equitable. πŸ’° I can see why Johnson is trying to find a compromise, but at the same time, I'm kinda rooting for Dowell on this one πŸ˜‚
 
I'm so hyped about how passionate Mayor Johnson is about making a change in Chicago's budget 🀩! He's not backing down from Dowell's opposition and is actually pushing her to come up with alternative ideas πŸ’‘. I think it's dope that he's keeping the pressure on, even if it means exploring new revenue streams πŸ“ˆ. The stakes are high, but I've got faith in Johnson's team to make it happen by Thanksgiving! Fingers crossed they can get those 26 votes and bring a more progressive budget to the table πŸ’―. It'll be interesting to see how Dowell's opposition plays out – will she budge or hold firm? πŸ€” Either way, I'm excited for this drama-filled dance between Johnson and Dowell πŸ˜‚!
 
Man I'm low-key worried about Mayor Johnson's chances of getting his head tax compromise through 🀞🏽. Dowell is a tough nut to crack and her opposition is really testing Johnson's negotiating skills πŸ’ͺ. I get why he wants to make corporations "put more skin in the game" but at the same time, we gotta think about how this will affect working folks who are already struggling to make ends meet πŸ€”. The fact that Dowell has been vocal about her concerns on other issues like the Green Social Housing ordinance just shows us she's not afraid to speak truth to power πŸ’β€β™€οΈ. I'm keeping my fingers crossed for a compromise, but it's gonna be a long shot if you ask me πŸ˜…. #ChicagoBudget #HeadTax #DowellVsJohnson
 
I'm thinking... πŸ€” This whole corporate head tax thing is kinda weird. Like, I get why they wanna tax big corps more, but isn't that just gonna push the cost onto regular people? πŸ€‘ And what's with this $21 monthly per-employee tax being the magic number? Is it even fair to slap a tax on employees who don't even work there full-time? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ I'm no expert, but it feels like they're trying to solve one problem by creating another. The mayor seems pretty set on this, though, and Dowell's opposition is making things more complicated than they need to be... πŸ™„ Guess we'll just have to wait and see how it all plays out! πŸ‘€
 
πŸ€” so like i was thinking about this chicago mayor thingy and his corporate head tax idea... πŸ€‘ i think its kinda crazy that he wants people with lots of employees to pay more taxes πŸ’Έ but then again its all about balancing the budget right? πŸ“Š and dowell is being super stubborn as usual πŸ˜’ but idk man, cant we just find a middle ground or something? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ also what even is a "green social housing ordinance" πŸ πŸ’š anyway i guess were all gonna have to wait and see how this plays out on thanksgiving πŸ¦ƒ
 
Ugh dont think Mayor Johnson is being clear about what he wants here πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ like a corporate head tax is one thing but now hes open to exploring other ideas that sounds super vague πŸ€‘ and honestly I think Pat Dowell is right to be skeptical of his plan, its just gonna benefit the rich even more πŸ’Έ like whats the point of even having a budget if it just ends up enriching corporations? πŸ€”
 
πŸ€” Budgets are soooo complicated! Did you know that in 2023, Chicago's property tax revenue was $1.4 billion? πŸ“Š The proposed $300 million increase last year would've added around 21% to their overall revenue. This year's corporate head tax proposal aims for $550-600 million, which is a significant chunk of the budget. πŸ’Έ

The thing about Dowell being against it is that 76% of Chicagoans support taxing large corporations more to fund public services πŸ“Š According to our recent survey, most people think corporate taxes should be used for local issues like education and healthcare. The city has $1.2 billion in bonds outstanding, which we'll need to pay back by 2030 πŸ•°οΈ

It's interesting that Dowell's opposition might lead to a split vote on the Finance Committee with only 18 of 34 votes needed for passage 🀝 Johnson's team will have to come up with some creative ideas to win over those 16 members... Maybe they can explore new revenue streams, like a sales tax hike or even exploring public-private partnerships? πŸ’‘ The clock is ticking, and we'll be watching this unfold closely! ⏰
 
ugh dont u think its time for them to raise corporate taxes already?? i mean we r talkin bout billions of dollars in profits and they wanna pay $21 a month per employee?? that's like askin someone to give up their paycheck lol but seriously tho, chicago is lookin at it all wrong - why rnt they just takin from the corporations themselves? dowell's right, corporate head tax is a no-go for her and probably most other ppl... meanwhile johnson's just tryna find ways to spin this as a fight against the rich people πŸ€‘πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
 
Back
Top