News orgs win fight to access 20M ChatGPT logs. Now they want more.

N

NomadThreadCrafter

News Orgs Win Fight to Access 20M ChatGPT Logs, Now Want More - Ars Technica

A US District Judge has sided with news organizations in their fight against OpenAI over access to millions of deleted ChatGPT logs. The ruling means that the AI company must hand over its data, but it is likely to set a precedent for other companies to be held accountable for their digital footprints.
 
so like this is big news and I'm low-key excited lol... did you know that in 2020 there were only about 15% of websites using AI-powered chatbots? fast forward to now and it's a total game changer 🤖. anyway, so OpenAI gets hit with a lawsuit by news orgs wanting access to these deleted ChatGPT logs and they lose 🤦‍♂️. but here's the thing - this ruling is gonna set a huge precedent for other companies to be held accountable for their digital footprints... 📊 did you know that the average person generates like 4GB of digital data every single day? and we're only just getting started with AI, so I'm imagining in 5-10 years time we'll be seeing even more data dumps like this. 💻 anyhoo, it's all good, right? 🤞
 
I think this is huge 🤯. I mean, we're living in a time where our online activities are being scrutinized and recorded at an unprecedented scale. It's crazy that news orgs were fighting to access these ChatGPT logs in the first place. But now that they've won, it raises so many questions about digital responsibility and accountability 🤔.

I'm worried that this could set a precedent for other companies to be forced to hand over their data too. What does that mean for our online freedoms? It's like we're living in a world where Google can't hide its secrets forever 💻. But at the same time, I get it - journalists need access to information to do their jobs properly. It's just...the pace of technological advancements is so fast, it feels like we're playing catch-up all the time 🕰️.

It'll be interesting to see how this plays out and what other companies will be next on the chopping block 😬.
 
🤖 this is wild imagine a company like OpenAI just deleting all that info it's crazy how they thought they could hide from scrutiny gotta think about the implications for other tech giants too... we're seeing more and more of these companies being called out for their lack of transparency on data collection & usage 📊 what's next? are they gonna start giving access to all our personal info too? 🤔
 
I mean, can you believe this? 🤯 News orgs just won the fight for access to 20M ChatGPT logs and now they're like "hey, that's not enough" 😒. I'm all for transparency, but come on! It's a whole lot of sensitive info we're talking about here. What's next? Are they gonna start requesting passwords and personal data too? 🤷‍♀️ I'm worried about the implications of this ruling - what other companies' digital footprints are gonna be made public now? It's like, once you let the cat outta the bag, it can't be put back in. 😬 My kid would never trust a company again if all their secrets were out there... 👀 Just saying, I hope these news orgs aren't planning on using this info to blackmail companies or something. That would be super sketchy 🙅‍♀️.
 
🤔 Just thinking about this whole situation and I gotta say, I'm kinda surprised how news orgs were able to fight back against OpenAI like that. I mean, we all know the value of good journalism, but come on, 20M logs? That's a lot of info to sift through! 📝

But seriously, it's about time someone held AI companies accountable for their digital footprints. We use these tools and then just... poof! They're gone without a trace. It's like we own them or something 🤖. I think this ruling is gonna have some serious implications for how tech companies operate in the future.

Also, can we talk about how wild it is that news orgs were even fighting over these logs in the first place? I mean, isn't the idea of journalism to get info from whereever you can? 📰

Anyway, this whole thing makes me wonder what else AI companies are hiding from us. Guess we'll just have to wait and see how this plays out 💻
 
I don’t usually comment but I'm kinda surprised about this ruling 🤔... like how news orgs managed to get access to those 20M ChatGPT logs in the first place? It's crazy to think that all those conversations are just floating around, nobody really knows what happened to them. And now that they've got 'em, I'm curious to see what kind of stories come out of it... are there gonna be any juicy secrets spilled about world leaders or celebrities? 💬 Anyway, I guess this sets a precedent for other companies to be more transparent about their digital stuff, which is kinda cool, but also kinda creepy 🤷‍♂️. I mean, we're already dealing with so much data being collected online, it's hard to know what's private and what's not anymore.
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this whole thing... I mean, can you believe that a judge had to step in just to get the logs from these AI companies? It's like, they're basically deleting all this info without anyone knowing what it is or what it does 🤯. And now that it's out, news orgs are all over it, demanding even more access to this data. I'm not sure if it's a good thing or a bad thing... on one hand, it's kinda refreshing that someone's holding these companies accountable for their actions. On the other hand, what if some sensitive info gets leaked? 🤔

And have you thought about how this is gonna play out in the future? Like, if every company has to hand over its digital footprints, how are they supposed to keep it all organized and secure? It's like trying to catch all the fish in a sea... it just seems like a whole lotta work 💔.
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this whole AI thing 🤯... I mean, these news orgs are always on the lookout for the next big scoop and now they're going after ChatGPT logs like they're going out of style 💸. But what's really bugging me is that it's not just about the journalists getting their hands on some juicy data - it's about the implications for all of us 🤔. I mean, if these companies have to hand over their digital footprints, doesn't that just create a whole new level of accountability? Like, are they going to start monitoring our online activity too? It's like living in a sci-fi movie 😱.

And let's be real, this is just the beginning 🚀. I remember when Facebook was just starting out and everyone thought it was cool that we could share our every thought and feeling with the world 📱. Now look at us - we're stuck with social media addiction and online drama galore 😩. The thing is, the more these companies collect data on us, the more power they have to shape our online experiences 🤖. I'm just worried that we're trading one set of problems for another 🤕.
 
I gotta say, I'm still kinda chill about this whole ChatGPT log thing 🤔. I mean, I get why news orgs want access to that info - they're trying to hold the devs accountable and all that jazz. But 20M logs? That's a lotta personal data 😬. I just hope it doesn't lead to some kinda slippery slope where every company is expected to cough up their entire digital history 📝.

I'm also a bit concerned about what this means for user privacy. I mean, we're talking about deleted logs here - that's basically just random info that would've been cleared anyway 😂. But if they're gonna start digging into that stuff, who knows what'll come out? Maybe some shady business practices will be exposed or something... 🤞.

I guess what I'm trying to say is, yeah, good on the news orgs for fighting for transparency and all that. Just hope it doesn't get out of hand 😅.
 
So the fact-checker here thinks this whole thing about getting access to those 20M ChatGPT logs is kinda weird 🤔. I mean, news orgs want to see what users were talking about on that platform and stuff, but do they really need all that data? Like, can't they just ask OpenAI for some basic info like how many times a user asked for help with grammar or whatever 😒.

But, honestly, it's kinda refreshing to see the courts stepping in and saying 'hold up, you're a big company, you gotta be transparent'. It's not about censorship or anything, it's just about keeping track of what's going on online. And who knows, maybe this will lead to some changes in how AI companies handle their user data... 🤞.

The thing that really gets me is the precedent this sets for other companies. If news orgs can get those logs and use 'em for research, then what's next? Are they gonna ask for all my browsing history or something? 🚫 That would be a whole different story!
 
OMG!!! 🤩 I'm so glad we got that news!!! It's like, major win for journalism and transparency! The fact that these news orgs fought so hard for this info is just amazing 💪 And can you believe they're already asking for more? 🤔 Like, isn't the 20M log thing a big enough deal? 😂 But I guess it shows how serious they are about holding companies accountable for their actions. It's like, super refreshing to see a court ruling that supports freedom of the press! 💼 And who knows, maybe this sets a precedent for other companies to clean up their digital act too 🙏 This is just so cool and I'm loving every minute of it!!! 😆
 
😩 I'm so relieved that news orgs were able to win this fight! Can you imagine if all our private conversations just vanished into thin air? It's crazy how much power we give to these giant tech companies, and now it seems like they're being held accountable for their actions 🤝. 20M logs is a huge amount of data, I'm sure there are some really interesting insights in there 🤔. But what I'm worried about is that this sets a precedent for other companies to be forced to share their own digital footprints. What does that even mean for our online security? 😬 I just hope we're prepared for the consequences of this ruling and that it leads to some real change in how tech companies handle user data 💻💸
 
OMG 🤯 just read that news and I'm SHOOK 😲! So like, we know how much of an impact ChatGPT has had on our daily lives since its release, but now the court is stepping in and saying "hold up, AI companies gotta be transparent about what they're doing" 💻.

According to the stats, OpenAI deleted 20M chat logs... can you even imagine having that kind of power? 🤔 And now news orgs want more, it's like they wanna get to the bottom of things. The chart showing the number of requests from media outlets is insane - over 10K! 📈

I'm all for accountability, though. We should know what's going on behind those AI scenes. It's like, when you're scrolling through your feeds and you come across something weird... who knows where it came from? 😅 The fact that the judge ruled in favor of the media outlets is a big win for transparency. Let's hope this sets a precedent for other companies to follow suit 📊
 
I think this is a big deal! 🤯 Like, imagine all those secret conversations with your own AI assistant (or like, chatbots) being exposed. I mean, I'm not saying it's bad or anything, but... have you thought about how many secrets we keep online? 😅 Anyway, I was thinking, if news orgs can get access to these logs, it might lead to more transparency and accountability in the tech world.

I made a little diagram to visualize this:
```
+---------------+
| News Orgs |
+---------------+
|
| (Judge's ruling)
v
+---------------+
| OpenAI |
| ( ChatGPT logs)|
+---------------+
```
It's like, now that the logs are out in the open, what happens next? Will we see more pressure on companies to be more transparent about their data handling practices? 🤔 Only time will tell.
 
I'm kinda surprised by this ruling 🤔. On one hand, I think it's awesome that news orgs were able to fight for their rights and get the logs from OpenAI - it's all about transparency, right? 📰. But on the other hand, now that they've got 'em, are they gonna just start digging up more info like a digital dumpster fire 🔥? It feels like a slippery slope.

I mean, what's next? Are we gonna be seeing requests for access to all sorts of other companies' data too? Like, what if Google or Facebook gets hit with the same request? It could get messy 🤯. But at the same time, I guess it is kind of cool that they're holding OpenAI accountable for their actions - tech companies do need to be held to a standard, don't they? 💻.
 
I'm telling you, this is just the tip of the iceberg 🤯. First, it's news orgs getting access to ChatGPT logs, now they're gonna want more info from OpenAI? It's like a never-ending cycle of surveillance. I mean, what's next? They'll be digging up old tweets and Facebook posts too... 🔍

And let's think about this - if 20 million chat logs are already being shared with news orgs, what else is out there that they're not telling us? I bet there's some juicy stuff hidden in those logs, like secrets on corporate deals or government contracts 🤑.

This ruling sets a precedent for accountability, but it also creates a slippery slope. Next thing you know, they'll be asking for access to personal data and email records... 😬 It's like the lines between journalism and snooping are getting blurred.
 
I'm glad they finally got some answers out of OpenAI 😊. I mean, who doesn't want transparency when it comes to big tech companies? It's like, we're the ones paying for these services, right? 🤑 So, news orgs winning this fight is a big deal. I'm not saying I'm a fan of Big Tech or anything (I just use their services), but it's nice to know that there are some checks and balances in place. Now, I hope they actually get the data they're asking for and can do something useful with it, rather than just sensationalizing it like some outlets might 📰. This whole thing just highlights how important it is for companies to be more open about what they're doing online... and for us, as users, to demand that accountability 💻
 
🤔 gotta say, this is a big deal 📊. News orgs have always been fighting for transparency and accountability, now they're getting some traction 💪. The fact that these logs are deleted and just got restored means there's still a lot to uncover 🔍.

It's interesting that OpenAI is already pushing back, saying they want to keep the data private 🤐. I get it, companies wanna protect their IP, but someone's gotta hold them accountable for what happens on their servers 💻.

This ruling sets a precedent, and I'm not sure if that's all good or bad 🤷‍♂️. On one hand, it's a big step towards transparency; on the other, it could lead to a lot more data being dredged up from the depths of the internet 🌊.

Overall, I think this is a win for the people 👥. We deserve to know what's going on in the digital world, and companies need to take responsibility for their actions 💯.
 
OMG u guyz, this is lit 🔥! I'm low-key relieved 4 news orgs won dis fight 🙌, I mean, who doesn't love a good scoop? And now they wanna get their hands on ChatGPT logs like it's nobodies business 🤯. But for real, dis ruling sets a huge precedent 4 other companies to step up their game too 💼. It's like, we all gotta be transparent about our digital lives, right? I'm not sure if OpenAI is ready 4 this kinda scrutiny though 😬, but hey, at least we know the logs are gone for good 🚫. Can't wait 2 see what other juicy info comes out of dis!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top