A New Dawn for Tech: Trump's Tariffs Bring Hope to Break Free from "Enshittification"
The recent tariffs imposed by the US government under the Trump administration have created a unique opportunity for tech companies to rethink their business models and break free from the shackles of "enshittification" – a term coined by Cory Doctorow, a renowned science fiction author, activist, and journalist.
For decades, the US has used its trade dominance to coerce other countries into adopting laws that restrict the ability of programmers to modify or customize digital products. This has resulted in a market where tech companies can extract massive profits from consumers without providing them with meaningful choices or alternatives. However, with Trump's tariffs, this old bargain is no longer tenable.
The US tech industry has long relied on its ability to blackmail foreign governments and companies into adopting anti-circumvention laws that restrict the right to repair and modify digital products. These laws have been used to stifle innovation and limit consumer choice, as companies like Apple and Google use their market power to dictate what software and services are allowed on their platforms.
But with Trump's tariffs, the tables have turned. Foreign governments and companies can now retaliate by refusing to play by the US's rules, and instead adopting their own anti-circumvention laws that prioritize consumer rights and digital sovereignty. This has created a new dynamic where tech companies must confront the possibility of losing market share and profits as consumers switch to alternative platforms and services.
Doctorow sees this as an opportunity for change. "It's not just digital rights activists, investors and entrepreneurs who have a dog in this fight," he writes. "Now that Trump has made it clear that the US no longer has allies or trading partners, only rivals and adversaries, everyone in the world is trying to figure out whether they can trust American tech infrastructure with their governments, businesses and personal data."
The answer, Doctorow suggests, is a resounding "no." As investors and companies begin to question the reliability of US tech infrastructure, there is a growing recognition that alternatives are needed. This could involve adopting more open-source technologies, using decentralized platforms, or exploring new business models that prioritize consumer choice and digital sovereignty.
Of course, this will not be an easy process. It will require significant investments in research and development, as well as changes to existing laws and regulations. But with Trump's tariffs creating a new level of uncertainty and competition in the tech industry, there is finally a glimmer of hope that we can break free from the stranglehold of "enshittification" and build a more sustainable and equitable digital future.
As Doctorow puts it, "Making hundreds of billions of dollars every year is a far superior course of action to building a bunch of datacentres in support of an AI sector that is losing billions of dollars every year and heading for a tremendous crash." The time has come to challenge the status quo and explore new ways of doing business that prioritize people over profits.
The recent tariffs imposed by the US government under the Trump administration have created a unique opportunity for tech companies to rethink their business models and break free from the shackles of "enshittification" – a term coined by Cory Doctorow, a renowned science fiction author, activist, and journalist.
For decades, the US has used its trade dominance to coerce other countries into adopting laws that restrict the ability of programmers to modify or customize digital products. This has resulted in a market where tech companies can extract massive profits from consumers without providing them with meaningful choices or alternatives. However, with Trump's tariffs, this old bargain is no longer tenable.
The US tech industry has long relied on its ability to blackmail foreign governments and companies into adopting anti-circumvention laws that restrict the right to repair and modify digital products. These laws have been used to stifle innovation and limit consumer choice, as companies like Apple and Google use their market power to dictate what software and services are allowed on their platforms.
But with Trump's tariffs, the tables have turned. Foreign governments and companies can now retaliate by refusing to play by the US's rules, and instead adopting their own anti-circumvention laws that prioritize consumer rights and digital sovereignty. This has created a new dynamic where tech companies must confront the possibility of losing market share and profits as consumers switch to alternative platforms and services.
Doctorow sees this as an opportunity for change. "It's not just digital rights activists, investors and entrepreneurs who have a dog in this fight," he writes. "Now that Trump has made it clear that the US no longer has allies or trading partners, only rivals and adversaries, everyone in the world is trying to figure out whether they can trust American tech infrastructure with their governments, businesses and personal data."
The answer, Doctorow suggests, is a resounding "no." As investors and companies begin to question the reliability of US tech infrastructure, there is a growing recognition that alternatives are needed. This could involve adopting more open-source technologies, using decentralized platforms, or exploring new business models that prioritize consumer choice and digital sovereignty.
Of course, this will not be an easy process. It will require significant investments in research and development, as well as changes to existing laws and regulations. But with Trump's tariffs creating a new level of uncertainty and competition in the tech industry, there is finally a glimmer of hope that we can break free from the stranglehold of "enshittification" and build a more sustainable and equitable digital future.
As Doctorow puts it, "Making hundreds of billions of dollars every year is a far superior course of action to building a bunch of datacentres in support of an AI sector that is losing billions of dollars every year and heading for a tremendous crash." The time has come to challenge the status quo and explore new ways of doing business that prioritize people over profits.