UN Security Council Vote on International Stabilisation Force for Gaza Looms, with US Leadership a Key Point of Contention
A United Nations security council resolution aimed at introducing an international stabilisation force into Gaza is likely to be passed within two weeks, but it remains uncertain whether the necessary agreement can be reached over key issues such as US military leadership and the role of Hamas.
At a recent meeting in Istanbul, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan warned that if countries that provide troops to the International Stabilization Force (ISF) disagree with its mission and authority, they will not participate. Fidan's comments underscored the challenge of reconciling the competing priorities of Muslim states seeking to support Palestinian security without appearing to take sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The US is expected to play a dominant role in the ISF, which would involve deploying troops to Gaza with a view to stabilizing the situation and paving the way for an Israeli withdrawal. The question of whether Israel's military leadership will be involved in the process remains unresolved, with Israel having rejected Turkey's offer to deploy troops.
In addition to disagreements over US leadership, other contentious issues include the role of Hamas and the scheduling of an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. Western diplomats suggest that the inclusion of a timetable for Israeli withdrawal is a condition of support for the ISF among some Arab states.
The fragile truce in Gaza has been repeatedly disrupted by violence, with 115 people killed and 352 injured on Tuesday, the deadliest day since the ceasefire came into effect last month. The German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul expressed alarm that humanitarian aid is not reaching those who need it most, highlighting the need for a more effective security framework.
As Arab states press for progress, there are concerns about whether Israel will accept the terms of an ISF mandate and whether Hamas will be required to disarm in exchange for guarantees against Israeli attacks. The appointment of Palestinian technocrats to administer Gaza has been hailed as a positive step, but questions remain over how they will interact with the International Stabilization Force.
Ultimately, the success of the ISF depends on its ability to balance competing demands and find a path forward that addresses the concerns of both Israelis and Palestinians. As the United Nations Security Council considers the draft resolution, it remains to be seen whether key issues can be resolved in time to prevent further instability in Gaza.
				
			A United Nations security council resolution aimed at introducing an international stabilisation force into Gaza is likely to be passed within two weeks, but it remains uncertain whether the necessary agreement can be reached over key issues such as US military leadership and the role of Hamas.
At a recent meeting in Istanbul, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan warned that if countries that provide troops to the International Stabilization Force (ISF) disagree with its mission and authority, they will not participate. Fidan's comments underscored the challenge of reconciling the competing priorities of Muslim states seeking to support Palestinian security without appearing to take sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The US is expected to play a dominant role in the ISF, which would involve deploying troops to Gaza with a view to stabilizing the situation and paving the way for an Israeli withdrawal. The question of whether Israel's military leadership will be involved in the process remains unresolved, with Israel having rejected Turkey's offer to deploy troops.
In addition to disagreements over US leadership, other contentious issues include the role of Hamas and the scheduling of an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. Western diplomats suggest that the inclusion of a timetable for Israeli withdrawal is a condition of support for the ISF among some Arab states.
The fragile truce in Gaza has been repeatedly disrupted by violence, with 115 people killed and 352 injured on Tuesday, the deadliest day since the ceasefire came into effect last month. The German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul expressed alarm that humanitarian aid is not reaching those who need it most, highlighting the need for a more effective security framework.
As Arab states press for progress, there are concerns about whether Israel will accept the terms of an ISF mandate and whether Hamas will be required to disarm in exchange for guarantees against Israeli attacks. The appointment of Palestinian technocrats to administer Gaza has been hailed as a positive step, but questions remain over how they will interact with the International Stabilization Force.
Ultimately, the success of the ISF depends on its ability to balance competing demands and find a path forward that addresses the concerns of both Israelis and Palestinians. As the United Nations Security Council considers the draft resolution, it remains to be seen whether key issues can be resolved in time to prevent further instability in Gaza.