Ford's advertising strategy has undergone a drastic shift in recent years, from its once-optimistic, cosmopolitan image of America to a more defensive and resentful tone. This transformation mirrors the changing cultural landscape of America under the Trump administration.
The iconic 1924 Ford ad, "Opening the highways to all mankind," showcased the company's vision of an America where everyone had access to the freedom and mobility provided by its cars. This ad embodied the populist and democratic ideals of America during that era, with a focus on travel being within reach of the middle class.
Fast-forward to the 2015 ad, "What's next?" which proclaimed, "Things you never saw coming." This ad hinted at an optimistic future where everyone had access to Ford's products, including women. The image of a young girl in a pink tutu staring adoringly at a black Mustang was particularly striking.
However, today's Ford ads convey a sense of defensiveness and resentment. A 2024 ad commemorating the Detroit Lions' entrance into Ford Field for the NFC Championship game makes much of the toughness of Detroit brands. The voiceover from actor Jeff Daniels echoes Trump's sentiment, emphasizing that there are no shortcuts to success and that hard work is necessary to achieve greatness.
This narrative resonates with the "deep story" concept coined by sociologist Arlie Russell Hochschild. According to Hochschild, this story involves a sense of frustration, disappointment, and resentment towards those perceived as having it easier than others, such as immigrants, minorities, and public sector workers. This narrative has animated much of conservative rhetoric under the Trump administration.
In contrast, Ford's earlier ads showcased an optimistic vision of America, with a focus on inclusivity, accessibility, and the American dream. Today, the company seems to be selling a more inward-facing, defensive version of itself, one that is closed-off to optimism and willing to blame others for its perceived struggles.
The implications of this shift in Ford's advertising strategy are significant. It reflects a broader cultural shift in America under Trump, where a sense of resentment and frustration towards the perceived elite has become increasingly prevalent. As Hochschild noted, this narrative feels true enough to power a political movement, even if its underlying facts may not be accurate.
Ultimately, Ford's struggle to reconcile its past and present branding strategies serves as a microcosm for the broader challenges facing America under Trump. Will the company find a way to regain its former optimism and inclusivity, or will it continue to echo the defensive and resentful tone of the Trump era?
				
			The iconic 1924 Ford ad, "Opening the highways to all mankind," showcased the company's vision of an America where everyone had access to the freedom and mobility provided by its cars. This ad embodied the populist and democratic ideals of America during that era, with a focus on travel being within reach of the middle class.
Fast-forward to the 2015 ad, "What's next?" which proclaimed, "Things you never saw coming." This ad hinted at an optimistic future where everyone had access to Ford's products, including women. The image of a young girl in a pink tutu staring adoringly at a black Mustang was particularly striking.
However, today's Ford ads convey a sense of defensiveness and resentment. A 2024 ad commemorating the Detroit Lions' entrance into Ford Field for the NFC Championship game makes much of the toughness of Detroit brands. The voiceover from actor Jeff Daniels echoes Trump's sentiment, emphasizing that there are no shortcuts to success and that hard work is necessary to achieve greatness.
This narrative resonates with the "deep story" concept coined by sociologist Arlie Russell Hochschild. According to Hochschild, this story involves a sense of frustration, disappointment, and resentment towards those perceived as having it easier than others, such as immigrants, minorities, and public sector workers. This narrative has animated much of conservative rhetoric under the Trump administration.
In contrast, Ford's earlier ads showcased an optimistic vision of America, with a focus on inclusivity, accessibility, and the American dream. Today, the company seems to be selling a more inward-facing, defensive version of itself, one that is closed-off to optimism and willing to blame others for its perceived struggles.
The implications of this shift in Ford's advertising strategy are significant. It reflects a broader cultural shift in America under Trump, where a sense of resentment and frustration towards the perceived elite has become increasingly prevalent. As Hochschild noted, this narrative feels true enough to power a political movement, even if its underlying facts may not be accurate.
Ultimately, Ford's struggle to reconcile its past and present branding strategies serves as a microcosm for the broader challenges facing America under Trump. Will the company find a way to regain its former optimism and inclusivity, or will it continue to echo the defensive and resentful tone of the Trump era?