A New York couple, Pamela Wridt and Robert Sauve, are suing the city over a NYPD camera that points directly into their bedroom. The camera is just one of tens of thousands owned and operated by the NYPD to feed into its massive warrantless surveillance system.
The Domain Awareness System, as it's called, collects data from public and private sources across the city, including video cameras, tracking technologies, biometric tools, and social media activity. It builds profiles that reconstruct people's private lives, essentially creating a "voyeuristic policing platform" that unifies multiple technologies into one centralized network.
This system has become a model for other state and local police departments, with bipartisan support and unprecedented amounts of funding, attorneys say. The NYPD's surveillance capacity is so vast it can "uncover constitutionally protected activity," such as political expression or religious practice, that would be unknowable from any single source.
Wridt and Sauve claim the camera outside their home has changed the character of their neighborhood, negatively affecting their mental health and well-being. They've had to mirror tint all their windows and can't even open them without being exposed.
The couple's lawsuit is the first of its kind to take on the NYPD surveillance system. Their attorneys hope it will shed light on other private companies and federal agencies that have access to data collected by the NYPD.
"This is not hyperbole," said O. Andrew F. Wilson, an attorney representing Sauve and Wridt. "We're seeing a full-on authoritarian takeover of our government."
The couple fears that lack of public knowledge about the Domain Awareness System breeds complacency, giving authorities space to entrench it.
"It's like my greatest concern and my greatest fear was confirmed," Sauve said. "People are getting more comfortable with this surveillance state being there."
				
			The Domain Awareness System, as it's called, collects data from public and private sources across the city, including video cameras, tracking technologies, biometric tools, and social media activity. It builds profiles that reconstruct people's private lives, essentially creating a "voyeuristic policing platform" that unifies multiple technologies into one centralized network.
This system has become a model for other state and local police departments, with bipartisan support and unprecedented amounts of funding, attorneys say. The NYPD's surveillance capacity is so vast it can "uncover constitutionally protected activity," such as political expression or religious practice, that would be unknowable from any single source.
Wridt and Sauve claim the camera outside their home has changed the character of their neighborhood, negatively affecting their mental health and well-being. They've had to mirror tint all their windows and can't even open them without being exposed.
The couple's lawsuit is the first of its kind to take on the NYPD surveillance system. Their attorneys hope it will shed light on other private companies and federal agencies that have access to data collected by the NYPD.
"This is not hyperbole," said O. Andrew F. Wilson, an attorney representing Sauve and Wridt. "We're seeing a full-on authoritarian takeover of our government."
The couple fears that lack of public knowledge about the Domain Awareness System breeds complacency, giving authorities space to entrench it.
"It's like my greatest concern and my greatest fear was confirmed," Sauve said. "People are getting more comfortable with this surveillance state being there."