Palestinian Self-Determination Key to Israeli Security in Gaza Conflict Resolution
A fragile ceasefire in Gaza is a temporary reprieve, and the real challenge lies in crafting a lasting solution that addresses both Palestinian aspirations for self-determination and Israeli concerns about security. According to Yael Berda, Associate Professor of Sociology and Anthropology at Hebrew University of Jerusalem and co-chair of "A Land For All", a non-profit organisation advocating for Palestinian rights.
In order to move forward, any proposed resolution must have Palestinian governance at its core, according to Berda. This means the establishment of an independent state with a functioning government capable of exercising control over its territory. Without this foundation, the ceasefire will merely be a temporary halt in hostilities, rather than a genuine break from violence.
Berda's assertion underscores the importance of Palestinian agency and autonomy in any resolution to the Gaza conflict. The idea that Israel's security concerns can be addressed without addressing these fundamental aspirations is seen as unrealistic by many experts.
Ultimately, the real endgame is not the temporary alleviation of tensions, but a sustainable and durable peace that acknowledges the rights of all parties involved. For Berda and her organisation, this means an independent Palestinian state with all the trappings of sovereignty, including a functional government capable of exercising control over its territory. Only then can Israel's security concerns be meaningfully addressed.
As the world watches the fragile ceasefire in Gaza, one thing is clear: any solution to the conflict must start with Palestinian self-determination and Israeli security. Anything less would be a hollow victory, offering only temporary relief from violence rather than genuine peace.
A fragile ceasefire in Gaza is a temporary reprieve, and the real challenge lies in crafting a lasting solution that addresses both Palestinian aspirations for self-determination and Israeli concerns about security. According to Yael Berda, Associate Professor of Sociology and Anthropology at Hebrew University of Jerusalem and co-chair of "A Land For All", a non-profit organisation advocating for Palestinian rights.
In order to move forward, any proposed resolution must have Palestinian governance at its core, according to Berda. This means the establishment of an independent state with a functioning government capable of exercising control over its territory. Without this foundation, the ceasefire will merely be a temporary halt in hostilities, rather than a genuine break from violence.
Berda's assertion underscores the importance of Palestinian agency and autonomy in any resolution to the Gaza conflict. The idea that Israel's security concerns can be addressed without addressing these fundamental aspirations is seen as unrealistic by many experts.
Ultimately, the real endgame is not the temporary alleviation of tensions, but a sustainable and durable peace that acknowledges the rights of all parties involved. For Berda and her organisation, this means an independent Palestinian state with all the trappings of sovereignty, including a functional government capable of exercising control over its territory. Only then can Israel's security concerns be meaningfully addressed.
As the world watches the fragile ceasefire in Gaza, one thing is clear: any solution to the conflict must start with Palestinian self-determination and Israeli security. Anything less would be a hollow victory, offering only temporary relief from violence rather than genuine peace.