Pantone, the renowned colour authority, has once again made headlines by proclaiming cloud dancer as its 2026 Colour of the Year. However, this move is sparking intense debate among fashion experts and cultural commentators.
Critics argue that Pantone's decision reflects a worrying trend towards "quiet luxury" and a clean-girl aesthetic, which prioritizes traditional values over diversity and inclusivity. Nicole Ocran, writer and podcaster, believes that cloud dancer embodies the eugenics-y ideology of purity and perfection, which is particularly problematic given the current climate of rising white nationalism.
Others argue that Pantone's Colour of the Year is nothing new, with many colours deemed "neutral" or "beauty whites." Paddy O'Donnell, international brand ambassador for Farrow & Ball, points out that a nuanced white like cloud dancer would be a welcome addition to their palette, as it can add warmth and depth to interior design.
However, Gabrielle Minoli, writer and content creator, sees cloud dancer as a "white supremacist dog-whistle," with its name and tone evoking the uncanny veneers of Fox News broadcasters. She suggests that Pantone's positioning of cloud dancer as a blank slate for increased imagination and innovation is eerily similar to language used by big tech executives to persuade us to buy into AI tools that chip away at our creativity and critical thinking.
On the other hand, Jules Standish, colour consultant and author, views cloud dancer as incredibly neutral, with its lack of warmth or coolness making it suitable for a wide range of individuals. She notes that white is notoriously tricky in colour analysis, but suggests that cloud dancer would look great on people during the summer season.
Ultimately, Pantone's decision to name cloud dancer its Colour of the Year raises important questions about the role of fashion and design in reflecting and shaping societal values. As our world becomes increasingly divided, it's essential that we engage with these conversations and use colour as a tool for creativity and self-expression β rather than just a marketing ploy.
Critics argue that Pantone's decision reflects a worrying trend towards "quiet luxury" and a clean-girl aesthetic, which prioritizes traditional values over diversity and inclusivity. Nicole Ocran, writer and podcaster, believes that cloud dancer embodies the eugenics-y ideology of purity and perfection, which is particularly problematic given the current climate of rising white nationalism.
Others argue that Pantone's Colour of the Year is nothing new, with many colours deemed "neutral" or "beauty whites." Paddy O'Donnell, international brand ambassador for Farrow & Ball, points out that a nuanced white like cloud dancer would be a welcome addition to their palette, as it can add warmth and depth to interior design.
However, Gabrielle Minoli, writer and content creator, sees cloud dancer as a "white supremacist dog-whistle," with its name and tone evoking the uncanny veneers of Fox News broadcasters. She suggests that Pantone's positioning of cloud dancer as a blank slate for increased imagination and innovation is eerily similar to language used by big tech executives to persuade us to buy into AI tools that chip away at our creativity and critical thinking.
On the other hand, Jules Standish, colour consultant and author, views cloud dancer as incredibly neutral, with its lack of warmth or coolness making it suitable for a wide range of individuals. She notes that white is notoriously tricky in colour analysis, but suggests that cloud dancer would look great on people during the summer season.
Ultimately, Pantone's decision to name cloud dancer its Colour of the Year raises important questions about the role of fashion and design in reflecting and shaping societal values. As our world becomes increasingly divided, it's essential that we engage with these conversations and use colour as a tool for creativity and self-expression β rather than just a marketing ploy.