"Meegyn Kelly walks a fine line between defending serial rapist and victim-blaming"
Megyn Kelly's SiriusXM show has become the focal point of heated debate after she sidestepped the issue of Jeffrey Epstein's heinous crimes, opting instead to nuance his behavior as merely a preference for "very young teen types" - specifically 15-year-old girls.
Her assertion that there is a difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old was met with scathing criticism from advocates and survivors who pointed out the stark reality of Epstein's decades-long pattern of coercion, trafficking, and sexual abuse involving minors.
Kelly seemed to downplay the severity of his actions by suggesting that labeling him a pedophile might be inaccurate. Her claim came after she distanced herself from former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, who had reported that Epstein possessed thousands of graphic videos involving minors. Kelly now questions the accuracy of these reports and has expressed distrust in Bondi's sources.
Critics have condemned Kelly for what many see as victim-blaming tactics by minimizing Epstein’s abuse and implying consent is present even at ages where it is non-existent. The notion that there exists a meaningful distinction between 15-year-old and 5-year-old girls in terms of pedophilia is seen as nothing short of reprehensible.
Kelly's SiriusXM show, which included the segment with a clip from Bondi, prompted immediate backlash - from both critics who deemed her comments tasteless to survivors who spoke out against what they perceived as minimizing Epstein's abuse.
Megyn Kelly's SiriusXM show has become the focal point of heated debate after she sidestepped the issue of Jeffrey Epstein's heinous crimes, opting instead to nuance his behavior as merely a preference for "very young teen types" - specifically 15-year-old girls.
Her assertion that there is a difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old was met with scathing criticism from advocates and survivors who pointed out the stark reality of Epstein's decades-long pattern of coercion, trafficking, and sexual abuse involving minors.
Kelly seemed to downplay the severity of his actions by suggesting that labeling him a pedophile might be inaccurate. Her claim came after she distanced herself from former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, who had reported that Epstein possessed thousands of graphic videos involving minors. Kelly now questions the accuracy of these reports and has expressed distrust in Bondi's sources.
Critics have condemned Kelly for what many see as victim-blaming tactics by minimizing Epstein’s abuse and implying consent is present even at ages where it is non-existent. The notion that there exists a meaningful distinction between 15-year-old and 5-year-old girls in terms of pedophilia is seen as nothing short of reprehensible.
Kelly's SiriusXM show, which included the segment with a clip from Bondi, prompted immediate backlash - from both critics who deemed her comments tasteless to survivors who spoke out against what they perceived as minimizing Epstein's abuse.
this is so messed up! like how can she even try to nuance that? he's a serial rapist and a predator, Megyn is basically saying it's okay for grown men to be attracted to teens because they're somehow different from 5-year-olds... no one should have a preference for young girls in the first place, let alone use language like "very young teen types". and what about all those graphic videos that Pam Bondi was talking about? shouldn't Megyn at least acknowledge those existent facts instead of doubting her sources? this whole thing is just so gross.
. Her attempt to nuance Jeffrey Epstein's behavior is not only misguided but also really hurtful to the victims and their families. I get that she was trying to have a nuanced conversation, but in my opinion, her approach just ended up being tone-deaf. I mean, come on, labeling someone a pedophile because they're into 15-year-olds and not 5-year-olds? That's like saying it's okay as long as the kids are a little older 
. Newsflash: no amount of age difference changes what's happening here - abuse is still abuse. And what really bothers me is that she implied that Bondi might have gotten her sources wrong, which is just not fair to the poor woman who was trying to do some good in this world 
. The victim-blaming vibe is just not okay, and I hope people call out Kelly for it 
.
Her comments were tasteless and unacceptable. But on the flip side, shouldn't we be able to have a nuanced conversation about these kinds of issues without totally demonizing people who disagree with us? Like, can't we try to find common ground or something? 
15-year-old girls are NOT 'preference' or 'types' they're HUMAN BEINGS deserving of respect and protection 
. And then Megyn Kelly comes along and tries to nuance Epstein's behavior by saying he only liked "very young teen types" 
. Like, hello, that's not nuance, that's victim-blaming! 
.
It's not about the age of consent, it's about power dynamics and exploitation. Kelly needs to educate herself on this issue instead of downplaying Epstein's abuse 