NJ Lawmakers Push for Stronger Protections Against ICE Cooperation
New Jersey lawmakers are racing to codify a law that would limit cooperation with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), in a bid to close loopholes that allow people to be funneled into deportation proceedings before their criminal cases are resolved.
The proposed legislation, which is set to come up for final approval next week, aims to restrict the sharing of information between law enforcement officials and ICE unless a person has been convicted of a crime. This change would apply to those with final orders of removal, including thousands of individuals who may not be aware that their orders were issued outside of court hearings.
Critics argue that current practices undermine due process and discourage crime reporting, often resulting in people being deported before they can even see the charges against them. Immigrant rights advocates point to cases where clients have been arrested, only to see their charges later dropped โ only for ICE to still pick them up. These instances of delayed deportation mean that individuals may be stuck in immigration detention while their cases stall.
Lawmakers say that growing fear among immigrant communities and eroding trust in law enforcement are driving the push for stronger protections. Ana Vasquez, an advocate with Wind of the Spirit, described seeing three ICE vests taking someone away from his car as a source of "fear" that's only increased in recent years. Monmouth County Prosecutor Raymond Santiago echoed her concerns, stating that police officers have spoken about losing goodwill with immigrant communities.
The package of bills would also restrict police stops based on suspected immigration status and designate sensitive locations where staff could not assist ICE or the state. However, Republican lawmakers have expressed skepticism about the legislation's constitutionality and questioned why it is necessary in the first place. Despite these doubts, the proposal passed the Judiciary Committee vote along party lines.
If signed into law by Governor-elect Phil Murphy, this codification would bring New Jersey in line with many other states that already limit cooperation with ICE. Advocates hope that stronger protections will help to maintain public trust and ensure that individuals receive fair treatment under the law.
New Jersey lawmakers are racing to codify a law that would limit cooperation with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), in a bid to close loopholes that allow people to be funneled into deportation proceedings before their criminal cases are resolved.
The proposed legislation, which is set to come up for final approval next week, aims to restrict the sharing of information between law enforcement officials and ICE unless a person has been convicted of a crime. This change would apply to those with final orders of removal, including thousands of individuals who may not be aware that their orders were issued outside of court hearings.
Critics argue that current practices undermine due process and discourage crime reporting, often resulting in people being deported before they can even see the charges against them. Immigrant rights advocates point to cases where clients have been arrested, only to see their charges later dropped โ only for ICE to still pick them up. These instances of delayed deportation mean that individuals may be stuck in immigration detention while their cases stall.
Lawmakers say that growing fear among immigrant communities and eroding trust in law enforcement are driving the push for stronger protections. Ana Vasquez, an advocate with Wind of the Spirit, described seeing three ICE vests taking someone away from his car as a source of "fear" that's only increased in recent years. Monmouth County Prosecutor Raymond Santiago echoed her concerns, stating that police officers have spoken about losing goodwill with immigrant communities.
The package of bills would also restrict police stops based on suspected immigration status and designate sensitive locations where staff could not assist ICE or the state. However, Republican lawmakers have expressed skepticism about the legislation's constitutionality and questioned why it is necessary in the first place. Despite these doubts, the proposal passed the Judiciary Committee vote along party lines.
If signed into law by Governor-elect Phil Murphy, this codification would bring New Jersey in line with many other states that already limit cooperation with ICE. Advocates hope that stronger protections will help to maintain public trust and ensure that individuals receive fair treatment under the law.