The London consensus is a timely challenge to Trump's isolationism | Phillip Inman

A group of prominent economists has gathered in London to challenge Donald Trump's isolationist views on economics. The resulting consensus aims to provide an alternative to the Washington consensus that celebrates free markets and liberal trade.

The key difference between this new perspective and Trump's America First agenda lies in its emphasis on cooperation, collective action, and a more nuanced understanding of economic progress. Instead of solely focusing on growth through deregulation and privatization, the London consensus prioritizes policies that promote social welfare, equality, and sustainable development.

One of the central arguments is that the pursuit of individual success at the expense of others leads to increased inequality and hampers economic progress. In contrast, investing in public goods such as education, healthcare, and social services can lead to more inclusive growth and improve the well-being of all citizens.

The London consensus also rejects the narrow focus on GDP as a measure of economic success, instead advocating for a broader range of indicators that take into account factors like mental health, community engagement, and environmental sustainability.

By promoting policies that prioritize social cohesion and collective action, the London consensus offers a timely challenge to Trump's isolationist views. Its emphasis on cooperation and shared prosperity is particularly relevant in an era where middle-income households are increasingly questioning whether they should focus on their own success or contribute to the greater good.

The book, which has been endorsed by prominent figures like Nigel Farage, Alice Weidel, Jordan Bardella, and Giorgia Meloni, aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of what works in the 21st century. Its authors argue that by adopting a more inclusive approach to economic policy, governments can create a more equitable and sustainable future for all citizens.

Ultimately, the London consensus offers a vision for a better economic order that prioritizes human well-being over individual gain. By promoting policies that promote social cohesion, equality, and sustainable development, it seeks to build a more just and prosperous society for all.
 
πŸ€” I think its kinda cool how these economists are tryin to challenge Trump's views on economics and create this new consensus that puts people first instead of just growth and profit πŸ€‘. It makes sense tho, 'cause we're livin in a world where inequality is gettin outta control and our mental health is sufferin πŸ€•. I mean, whats the point of havin all the wealth if we ain't happy or healthy? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure about this new consensus thingy... sounds like they're trying to give Trump a hard time about his 'America First' deal πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ. Back in my day, we didn't need all these fancy economists tellin' us what's good for the economy πŸ€‘. We just worked hard and earned our keep πŸ’ͺ. But I guess times have changed, and people are gettin' a bit richer... but also kinda miserable πŸ˜”. This London thingy seems to say that there's more to life than just makin' money πŸ’Έ. They're all about social welfare and stuff 🀝. Not sure if it's the right way to go, but hey, at least they're thinkin' about everyone else for a change πŸ‘.
 
Wow! 🀯 Interesting how these economists are trying to redefine what success in economics really means - focusing on the bigger picture of human well-being rather than just growth and profit πŸŒŽπŸ’Έ
 
lol i just read about this new economics thingy in london πŸ€” and i gotta say, it makes so much sense! who needs to be a millionaire to be happy when we can have equal access to healthcare, eduction and social services? πŸ“šπŸ₯

i mean, think about it. if we're only focusing on growth for the sake of growth, we're gonna end up with people struggling to make ends meet while the 1% get richer πŸ€‘. but what's the point of having a strong economy if everyone's not thriving? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

and yeah, lets ditch that GDP thingy too πŸ“‰ it's so narrow-minded. what about mental health, community engagement and environmental sustainability? don't those count for something? 🌟

anyway, i'm loving the idea of a more inclusive approach to economics. we need to start thinking about the bigger picture here 🌎 and create a society that prioritizes human well-being over individual gain πŸ’–.

here's a simple diagram to illustrate my point: `_____ _______
| | GDP |
| ====> | _____ |
| | _______|
|_______| Mental Health
|
|
v
_______ _____ _____ _____
| Community Engagement | Environmental Sustainability | Social Services
```
i hope this book gets a lot of attention and we can start to shift the conversation around economics πŸ“šπŸ‘₯.
 
just saw this thing about these economists in london, its kinda cool i guess they're saying we should focus on everyone's well being instead of just growing our economy fast, thats a good point, like remember when trump was talking about making america great again? now its more like making americans great together 🀝
 
πŸ€” I'm loving this new perspective on economics coming out of London! It's about time we shift away from the 'grow-at-all-costs' mentality and towards creating a more balanced approach that puts people first πŸ’–. Investing in public goods like education and healthcare is long overdue, imo. The focus on social welfare and equality makes total sense – it's not just about GDP growth anymore πŸ“ˆ. I'm also excited to see them challenging the traditional measure of success – mental health, community engagement, environmental sustainability... that's what matters most for a happy society 😊. Can't wait to dive into this book and learn more about the London consensus! πŸ“šπŸ‘
 
πŸ€” I think its about time we shifted our focus from just growing the economy to actually making sure everyone has access to a good life 🌎πŸ‘₯πŸ’Έ The GDP thing is so outdated, it's like we're only measuring success by how much money people have in their pockets πŸ’Έ. We need to start thinking about things like mental health and community engagement too 🀝 It makes sense that investing in public goods like education and healthcare would lead to more inclusive growth and a better quality of life for everyone πŸ“šπŸ₯
 
I think this new perspective is kinda cool πŸ€”. I mean, who doesn't want a more inclusive growth, right? But, at the same time, I'm not sure about ditching GDP as our measure of success entirely... I mean, it's still pretty useful for tracking economic progress, don't you think? And what about all those public goods that are supposedly super important? How do we make sure they're actually delivering on their promises? πŸ€‘

I also get why this new approach is timely, given the growing wealth gap and stuff. But, let's be real, it's not like this is going to be a magic bullet for inequality or anything 😬. It's all about finding that balance between individual success and collective action, you know?

Still, I love the idea of looking beyond GDP and focusing on those other indicators... mental health, community engagement – who knew they were so important? 🀯 And I'm all for promoting policies that support social cohesion. That's what we need more of in these times.

So yeah, I think this London consensus is worth exploring further πŸ‘. It's not perfect, but it's a good starting point, and who knows, maybe we can learn from each other 🀝.
 
πŸ€” idk why ppl gotta make economics so complicated, like can't we just agree that growth ain't everything? πŸ€‘ what's wrong with investing in people over profits? πŸ’Έ the whole "growth through deregulation" thing is just a fancy way of sayin' "we don't care about nobody but ourselves" πŸ˜’ and btw, who says GDP is the only measure of success? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ mental health matters, community engagement matters... all that jazz πŸ‘ so yeah, the London consensus sounds like a solid alternative to Trump's America First agenda πŸ™Œ
 
omg i am literally so down with this new economic perspective 🀩 the idea of investing in public goods instead of just deregulation is like a breath of fresh air πŸ’¨ we need to prioritize people's well-being over corporations' profits, you know? πŸ™Œ the book sounds super interesting and i hope it gets picked up by some world leaders soon πŸ“š fingers crossed for a more inclusive economy that benefits everyone 🀝
 
just what we need - another perspective on economics πŸ€”. think its interesting how the london consensus is challenging the washington consensus... kinda like how minimalism challenges consumerism. we're already drowning in stuff, do we really want to focus on growth at any cost? πŸ›οΈ let's consider what's truly important: human well-being over GDP πŸ’Έ
 
πŸ€” I'm still skeptical about these economists trying to one-up Trump's America First agenda with their London consensus. It sounds like just another fancy term for "we're going to regulate you into submission". 🚫 What's wrong with some good ol' fashioned capitalism? Don't get me wrong, I think social welfare and equality are important, but not at the expense of individual freedom, if you know what I mean.

I'm also not sold on these new economic indicators they're proposing. How are we supposed to measure mental health and environmental sustainability in a way that's comparable to GDP? It just seems like a bunch of buzzwords to me. And what about the cost of implementing all these new policies? Is it going to be passed on to the consumer, or is it just going to add to the already massive national debt?

I'll believe it when I see it – until then, I'm sticking with my trusty old dollar bill. πŸ’Έ
 
πŸ€” I mean, can't we just agree that growth isn't everything? Like, what's the point of being super rich if we're still struggling to make ends meet as a society? πŸ€‘ We need to start prioritizing people over profits, you know? Education and healthcare are like, essential for building a better future. And GDP just doesn't cut it when it comes to measuring success - that stuff is so outdated. Mental health, community engagement, environmental sustainability... those are the things we should be focusing on. It's time to rethink what success means in the 21st century and make sure everyone's got a shot at a good life 🌈πŸ’ͺ
 
I'm not sure what's wrong with Trump's America First agenda, I mean, back in the day, we used to have this thing called "global citizenship" where countries would work together for the greater good 🌎. Now it seems like everyone's just looking out for number one and it's all about growth at any cost πŸ’Έ. But I think this new London consensus is onto something – investing in public goods can't hurt, right? πŸ€” And yeah, let's ditch that GDP thing, mental health is way more important than a fancy number πŸ“Š. It's time for a change and I'm excited to see where this takes us πŸ‘
 
😊 I gotta say, this new economic vibe from the London folks is pretty interesting. It's like they're saying we've been going about it all wrong, you know? Focusin' on just growin' the economy no matter what, but neglectin' the people who make it all happen in the first place. 🀝 The idea that investing in public goods and social services can lead to more inclusive growth is something I can get behind. It's about time we start thinkin' about economic success as a team effort, not just individual gain. πŸ’Έ And ditchin' GDP as the sole measure of success? That's like, totally overdue! πŸ™Œ
 
just read about this new economics thingy in london... sounds like they're tryin to be the opposite of trump's whole "america first" vibe. seems pretty interesting, but gotta wonder if it's just a bunch of fancy words for more government control... i mean, how many times can we rely on our leaders to make things right? πŸ€”πŸ’Έ and what's with this obsession over GDP? doesn't that just measure how much stuff people own? like, isn't the point of economics supposed to be about people's actual well-being? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
Back
Top