A UN Security Council resolution aimed at establishing an International Stabilization Force in Gaza could be finalized within two weeks, but several contentious issues may delay its adoption. The proposed force is meant to bring stability to the region after years of violence and unrest.
The negotiations are complicated by disagreements over key aspects of the force's mandate, including US military leadership and the relationship with the Palestinian civil police force. Additionally, there is a debate about whether Israel should be required to withdraw from Gaza within a specific timeframe or if disarmament of Hamas should be conditional on the Israeli withdrawal.
Turkey has expressed willingness to contribute troops to the force, but its support for Hamas has raised concerns among Israel and other countries. The United States appears likely to play a leading role in the force's leadership, with many Western diplomats believing that American involvement is necessary to ensure the force can effectively enforce ceasefire agreements.
However, some Muslim leaders are hesitant to participate in a peacekeeping mission, as they prefer a more supportive role for their troops rather than being seen as enforcers. The force will likely operate independently of a new US civil military coordination center focused on humanitarian work.
Palestinian officials have expressed concerns about the need for a secure and stable Gaza, with Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi stating that Israel's presence in 53% of the territory creates an unsustainable security situation. The establishment of a deconfliction mechanism is also seen as crucial to prevent clashes between Israeli forces and Palestinian civilians.
Despite these challenges, Western diplomats remain optimistic about the prospects for the force, noting that progress has been made faster than expected. However, many acknowledge that the mission faces significant hurdles and will require sustained international support to succeed.
The negotiations are complicated by disagreements over key aspects of the force's mandate, including US military leadership and the relationship with the Palestinian civil police force. Additionally, there is a debate about whether Israel should be required to withdraw from Gaza within a specific timeframe or if disarmament of Hamas should be conditional on the Israeli withdrawal.
Turkey has expressed willingness to contribute troops to the force, but its support for Hamas has raised concerns among Israel and other countries. The United States appears likely to play a leading role in the force's leadership, with many Western diplomats believing that American involvement is necessary to ensure the force can effectively enforce ceasefire agreements.
However, some Muslim leaders are hesitant to participate in a peacekeeping mission, as they prefer a more supportive role for their troops rather than being seen as enforcers. The force will likely operate independently of a new US civil military coordination center focused on humanitarian work.
Palestinian officials have expressed concerns about the need for a secure and stable Gaza, with Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi stating that Israel's presence in 53% of the territory creates an unsustainable security situation. The establishment of a deconfliction mechanism is also seen as crucial to prevent clashes between Israeli forces and Palestinian civilians.
Despite these challenges, Western diplomats remain optimistic about the prospects for the force, noting that progress has been made faster than expected. However, many acknowledge that the mission faces significant hurdles and will require sustained international support to succeed.
I gotta say, this whole thing with the International Stabilization Force in Gaza is super complicated 
. I mean, you've got Turkey wanting in but not wanting to be seen as pro-Hamas 
, the US trying to lead it all while also being friends with Israel 
, and Palestinian officials just wanting some peace and stability for once 
.
. I feel like we're just throwing out different options without really thinking about how they'll play out in practice 
. And what's up with the US civil military coordination center? Sounds like a whole other can of worms 
.
. We need something that's gonna make a real difference, not just some fancy resolution with no real teeth 
. Fingers crossed, right? 
I cant even bleeve they r makin progress on this UN SC reso 
2 weeks is like a blink of an eye in diplomat world 
! I mean, its about time we got some stability in Gaza 
, btw 
Turkey's offer to contribut troops is super cool 
, and I hope they can make it work w/ US lead 
. Israel's concerns r understandable tho 
. Palestinian officials r right, its all about security & stability 
. Deconfliction mechanism is a must too 
! Fingers crossed 4 this reso to pass 
And on the US role, I think they're just trying to do what's best for everyone involved. They want the force to work smoothly so that ceasefire agreements can be enforced. But at the same time, some Muslim leaders are worried about being seen as enforcers... it's like we need a balance 
.
. It's not just about security, it's about making sure people have access to basic needs like food, water, and healthcare. Let's hope this force can really make a difference 
. I mean, who needs more time to negotiate when you've got a UN Security Council resolution on the table? And wow, Turkey is willing to contribute troops... as long as they don't have to deal with Hamas directly 
. It's not like it's going to be some kind of "don't let them see your guns" situation or anything.
. I mean, who needs Israeli consent when you've got American goodwill to fall back on? Meanwhile, Palestinian officials are over here like "guys, we need this stabilizing force so we can actually have some peace"... and everyone's just like *shrugs*.
, and then you've got the US pushing for control over Israel - who's really in charge here? 
.
.
. We need to have a clear vision for what we're trying to achieve here - which seems to be lost in all this jockeying for position 
The fact that Turkey is willing to contribute troops, despite their own issues, shows that some countries are more willing to put aside their differences for the greater good. 
This thing needs to happen ASAP. I want to see progress, not more meetings and talks. Where's the sense in all this? 
I'm also curious about how this whole thing's gonna play out with Hamas and Palestine... it feels like they're still super far apart 
what's the plan to make sure the force actually helps gaza instead of just being another layer of control? 
I'm thinking, if we're trying to make a peacekeeping force work in Gaza, shouldn't we at least consider alternative security solutions for Israel's presence there? Like, are we really gonna create this massive military force that could potentially escalate tensions even more?