The US has launched a military assault on Venezuela, sparking fears that this action will determine the future direction of South America's vast mineral wealth.
The attack was ostensibly aimed at one corrupt dictatorship in a dysfunctional country, but its ramifications are far wider. The US is seeking to tap into Venezuela's enormous oil reserves, which could exacerbate the climate crisis and make little economic sense given the existing infrastructure issues.
Despite having the largest oil reserves in the world, Venezuela's heavy, sour oil is difficult to refine, making it unsuitable for widespread use. However, it is suitable for asphalt production, a fact that was highlighted by Donald Trump during his visit to the Orinoco Belt, which contains over 300 billion barrels of oil.
The US has been expanding its presence in Guyana, Venezuela's Amazonian neighbor, and Maduro's efforts to claim those resources may have sealed his fate. The US government has released a social media post declaring "This is our hemisphere," sending a clear message to neighboring leaders that the region is now under Washington's control.
The Trump administration's national security strategy focuses on threats from the Americas, including migration, crime, and supply chain disruptions, rather than Russia. This implies that China, which overtook the US as the main trading partner of Latin America during the commodities boom, is the main rival to be defeated.
China has invested heavily in processing facilities and transport infrastructure in South America, while the US under Trump has imposed tariffs. However, the US is now trying to reverse this situation with military force and political interference in the Americas.
Several right-wing regional leaders have cheered this development, including Argentina's Javier Milei and Ecuador's president Daniel Noboa. They rely on US financial support to stabilize their economies and are seeking to open up extractive activities in their countries.
However, not all South American governments have welcomed this move. The governments of Mexico, Brazil, Colombia, Uruguay, and Cuba have condemned the US muscle flexing as a challenge to regional stability. Several leaders have expressed fears that Washington will try to interfere in their domestic politics.
Colombia's president Gustavo Petro has mobilized his armed forces along the border with Venezuela and vowed to take up arms if the threats intensify. He is up for re-election this year, and supporters say he is already the target of a misinformation and intimidation campaign by the White House.
Brazil's left-wing president Luiz InΓ‘cio Lula da Silva has also faced Trump's wrath, with the US leader responding to Lula's criticism by raising tariffs on Brazilian goods. However, this backfired, and Lula's popularity rating improved as voters rallied against this threat.
The use of armed force by the US in South America is a worrying development that threatens regional stability and democracy. The majority of people will likely be appalled by this action, but a powerful elite around Trump is calling the shots, prioritizing securing resources for its own citizens rather than international cooperation on global challenges.
The attack was ostensibly aimed at one corrupt dictatorship in a dysfunctional country, but its ramifications are far wider. The US is seeking to tap into Venezuela's enormous oil reserves, which could exacerbate the climate crisis and make little economic sense given the existing infrastructure issues.
Despite having the largest oil reserves in the world, Venezuela's heavy, sour oil is difficult to refine, making it unsuitable for widespread use. However, it is suitable for asphalt production, a fact that was highlighted by Donald Trump during his visit to the Orinoco Belt, which contains over 300 billion barrels of oil.
The US has been expanding its presence in Guyana, Venezuela's Amazonian neighbor, and Maduro's efforts to claim those resources may have sealed his fate. The US government has released a social media post declaring "This is our hemisphere," sending a clear message to neighboring leaders that the region is now under Washington's control.
The Trump administration's national security strategy focuses on threats from the Americas, including migration, crime, and supply chain disruptions, rather than Russia. This implies that China, which overtook the US as the main trading partner of Latin America during the commodities boom, is the main rival to be defeated.
China has invested heavily in processing facilities and transport infrastructure in South America, while the US under Trump has imposed tariffs. However, the US is now trying to reverse this situation with military force and political interference in the Americas.
Several right-wing regional leaders have cheered this development, including Argentina's Javier Milei and Ecuador's president Daniel Noboa. They rely on US financial support to stabilize their economies and are seeking to open up extractive activities in their countries.
However, not all South American governments have welcomed this move. The governments of Mexico, Brazil, Colombia, Uruguay, and Cuba have condemned the US muscle flexing as a challenge to regional stability. Several leaders have expressed fears that Washington will try to interfere in their domestic politics.
Colombia's president Gustavo Petro has mobilized his armed forces along the border with Venezuela and vowed to take up arms if the threats intensify. He is up for re-election this year, and supporters say he is already the target of a misinformation and intimidation campaign by the White House.
Brazil's left-wing president Luiz InΓ‘cio Lula da Silva has also faced Trump's wrath, with the US leader responding to Lula's criticism by raising tariffs on Brazilian goods. However, this backfired, and Lula's popularity rating improved as voters rallied against this threat.
The use of armed force by the US in South America is a worrying development that threatens regional stability and democracy. The majority of people will likely be appalled by this action, but a powerful elite around Trump is calling the shots, prioritizing securing resources for its own citizens rather than international cooperation on global challenges.