US Lawmakers Demand Justice Department Release All Epstein Files, Claim Department is 'Not Trusted' to Disclose Information
Two prominent US lawmakers, Ro Khanna of California and Thomas Massie of Kentucky, have urged a federal judge to appoint a special master to force the release of all remaining files related to Jeffrey Epstein. The disgraced financier and convicted sex offender was accused of numerous counts of sex trafficking, abuse, and murder, leading to widespread outrage.
The lawmakers claim that the Justice Department has failed to meet its deadline to disclose all relevant documents on December 19 last year as mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act. In a letter to US District Judge Paul Engelmayer, Khanna and Massie criticized the department's handling of the case, stating that it is "not only a flagrant violation" of the act but also poses a significant threat to survivors who have been affected by Epstein's actions.
According to the Justice Department, only 12,285 documents were released so far, accounting for less than 1% of all related files. However, Khanna and Massie express doubts over these figures, citing inconsistencies in the department's reporting. They believe that the DOJ may be overstating the scope of responsive materials, thereby portraying compliance as unmanageable.
Furthermore, the lawmakers point out that the Justice Department has failed to submit required reports detailing redactions and records withheld from release within 15 days of the deadline to the House and Senate judiciary committees. This lack of transparency makes effective oversight and judicial review significantly more challenging.
As part of their request, Khanna and Massie asked Judge Engelmayer to grant authority to an independent monitor to notify the court about the true nature and extent of document production. They also expressed concerns that without this process in place, the DOJ would not produce records required by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, as it has represented to the court.
The lawmakers' actions follow recent criticism of the Justice Department's handling of the case, with many survivors expressing frustration over the lack of transparency and accountability. The push for full disclosure highlights ongoing concerns about justice and accountability in high-profile cases like Epstein's.
Two prominent US lawmakers, Ro Khanna of California and Thomas Massie of Kentucky, have urged a federal judge to appoint a special master to force the release of all remaining files related to Jeffrey Epstein. The disgraced financier and convicted sex offender was accused of numerous counts of sex trafficking, abuse, and murder, leading to widespread outrage.
The lawmakers claim that the Justice Department has failed to meet its deadline to disclose all relevant documents on December 19 last year as mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act. In a letter to US District Judge Paul Engelmayer, Khanna and Massie criticized the department's handling of the case, stating that it is "not only a flagrant violation" of the act but also poses a significant threat to survivors who have been affected by Epstein's actions.
According to the Justice Department, only 12,285 documents were released so far, accounting for less than 1% of all related files. However, Khanna and Massie express doubts over these figures, citing inconsistencies in the department's reporting. They believe that the DOJ may be overstating the scope of responsive materials, thereby portraying compliance as unmanageable.
Furthermore, the lawmakers point out that the Justice Department has failed to submit required reports detailing redactions and records withheld from release within 15 days of the deadline to the House and Senate judiciary committees. This lack of transparency makes effective oversight and judicial review significantly more challenging.
As part of their request, Khanna and Massie asked Judge Engelmayer to grant authority to an independent monitor to notify the court about the true nature and extent of document production. They also expressed concerns that without this process in place, the DOJ would not produce records required by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, as it has represented to the court.
The lawmakers' actions follow recent criticism of the Justice Department's handling of the case, with many survivors expressing frustration over the lack of transparency and accountability. The push for full disclosure highlights ongoing concerns about justice and accountability in high-profile cases like Epstein's.